Compensation for US terror suspect

The US government has agreed to pay $300,000 to an Egyptian man who was detained for nearly a year after the 9/11 attacks but was never linked to terrorism, his lawyer says.

    Dozens of federal officials were named in the law suit

    Haeyoung Yoon, who represents Ehab Elmaghraby, said she believed it was the first settlement involving the claims of people detained after 11 September.

    Elmaghraby, a former restaurant worker, was held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn from 1 October 2001 until August 2002.

    He was not charged with any crime connected to terrorism, but pleaded guilty to credit card fraud and was deported in August 2003.

    Yoon said he now said he was innocent of the credit card fraud.

    In a lawsuit filed in August 2004, Elmaghraby and a Pakistani man, Javaid Iqbal, said their rights were violated in US custody and sought compensatory damages.

    Unusual treatment

    They also argued that the government would not let them appeal against their solitary confinement in a special unit of the detention centre.

    Their lawsuit named John Ashcroft, the former US attorney general, and dozens of other federal officials.

    "Despite the fact that the US admitted no wrongdoing, they are compensating Mr Elmaghraby for the injuries he suffered"

    Haeyoung Yoon,

    Elmaghraby said he was shackled, shoved into walls, punched and called a terrorist at the facility.

    Yoon said he was subjected to repetitive strip searches, and a correction officer penetrated his anal cavity with a flashlight.

    She added that while in custody, Elmaghraby's thyroid condition was misdiagnosed as asthma, worsening it. He wanted to continue with the lawsuit, but settled because of his mounting medical costs.

    Yoon said: "Despite the fact that the US admitted no wrongdoing, they are compensating Mr Elmaghraby for the injuries he suffered."

    Cited for brutality

    The Metropolitan Detention Centre was cited for brutal treatment of detainees in a 2003 report by the Department of Justice's inspector general.

    Iqbal's case against the government continues.

    A federal judge in September 2005 rejected a claim by Ashcroft that the lawsuit should be dismissed partly because the threat of foreign terrorism exempts the government from following rules made in peacetime.

    Ashcroft said in a response to the lawsuit that the threat of terrorist attacks meant the government should not have been required to follow regulations allowing inmates to appeal against assignment to the special unit.

    More than 80 men were classified as suspected terrorists and were jailed in high-security cells at the Brooklyn facility between 14 September 2001 and 27 August 2002.



    How different voting systems work around the world

    How different voting systems work around the world

    Nearly two billion voters in 52 countries around the world will head to the polls this year to elect their leaders.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    How the art world's hunger for ancient artefacts is destroying a centuries-old culture. A journey across the Himalayas.