Chirac raises threat of nuclear strikes

Jacques Chirac, the French president, has provoked concern and criticism from opposition parties at home and in Germany after suggesting the threat of a nuclear strike against any state that launches terrorist attacks on French soil.

    Chirac: "Firm and appropriate response"

    It was the first time Chirac has spoken publicly of nuclear action against foreign countries and he said France's doctrine of nuclear deterrence has now been extended to protect the country's strategic supplies, taken to mean oil.

    Speaking during a visit to a French nuclear bas in Brittany, Chirac said: "Leaders of any state that uses terrorist means against us, as well as any that may be envisaging - in one way or another - using weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would be exposing themselves to a firm and appropriate response on our behalf.

    "That response could be conventional, it could also be of another nature," he said in a clear reference to nuclear weapons.

    "Our world is marked by the emergence of affirmations of power that rely on the possession of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons"

    Jacques Chirac

    The president said he was extending the definition of "vital interests" protected by France's nuclear umbrella to include allies and "strategic supplies".

    The French press understood "strategic supplies" to include oil.

    Le Monde newspaper said that was aimed at "probably also those countries from which France imports part of its energy needs".

    Graduated response

    "If, theoretically, such interests were threatened by regional powers - Iran, North Korea? - France would react," the paper said.

    The French president, however, did not single out any country in his speech.

    He did indicate, though, that the previous Cold War stance of threatening massive and widespread destruction against enemies had been changed to a doctrine permitting a graduated and limited nuclear response.

    Chirac's comments have received
    a mixed response at home

    France has configured its nuclear arsenal to be able to respond "flexibly and reactively" to any threat, by reducing the number of nuclear heads on certain missiles on board its submarines, he said.

    "Our world is marked by the emergence of affirmations of power that rely on the possession of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons," he said.

    In an apparent reference to Iran, Chirac condemned "the temptation by certain countries to obtain nuclear capabilities in contravention of treaties".

    Cold War echoes

    There was mixed reaction to Chirac's statements.

    In France the former prime minister Laurent Fabius, speaking on behalf of the Socialists, said there was nothing shocking about the position put forward.

    But Helene Luc, a senator from the Communist Party and member of a defence committee, said: "This extension of the concept of nuclear dissuasion takes us back years to the Cold War and can only deepen tensions with countries that aspire to have such weapons."

    The comments also provoked concerned reactions in Germany, from across the political spectrum and the press.

    There was no official comment from Angela Merkel's coalition government but opposition MP Winfried Nachtwei said Chirac's comments were "totally adventurous" and "irresponsible".

    "Chirac's threat is not only unwise, but also counterproductive"

    Handesblatt newspaper

    Andreas Schockenhoff, the deputy president of Merkel's parliamentary party said in an interview on Friday with the regional daily Koelner Stadtanzeiger: "I fear that these comments will not help the international community achieve the highest level of solidarity."

    The comments were also widely criticised in German newspapers.

    Chirac's comment's are "clearly counterproductive," the economic daily Handelsblatt said.

    The Westdeutsche Zeitung in Duesseldorf said: "Chirac's threat is not only unwise, but also counterproductive, because it leads to believe that  diplomatic means are very limited in the face of nuclear ambitions."



    How different voting systems work around the world

    How different voting systems work around the world

    Nearly two billion voters in 52 countries around the world will head to the polls this year to elect their leaders.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    The great plunder: Nepal's stolen treasures

    How the art world's hunger for ancient artefacts is destroying a centuries-old culture. A journey across the Himalayas.