S Africa court backs gay marriage

South Africa's high court has ruled the country's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional and instructed parliament to amend marriage laws to include same-sex unions within the year.

    South Africa's parliament has one year to enact new laws

    The Constitutional Court ruling put South Africa on course to become at least the world's fifth country to permit same-sex marriage.

    It will also be the first country in Africa to do so, a continent where homosexuality is largely taboo.

    In a ruling delivered by the constitutional court, Justice Albie Sachs said: "The common law definition of marriage is declared to be inconsistent with the constitution and invalid to the extent that it does not permit same-sex couples to enjoy the status and benefits it accords heterosexual couples."

    The decision followed a Supreme Court of Appeal ruling in November 2004 that said same-sex couples could get married following an application by lesbian couple Marie Fourie and Cecilia Bonthuys.

    "It's a bit disappointing. It feels like it's one step forward and still another one step backwards"

    Keketso Maema, lawyer for Lesbian and Gay Equality project

    That ruling requested that the courts change the common-law definition of marriage from being a "union between a man and a woman" to a "union between two persons".

    But in its ruling on Thursday, the constitutional court judge said it was up to parliament to make the necessary changes.

    Only one of the court's 11 judges dissented from the ruling,
    arguing the court should have legalised gay marriage with
    immediate effect.

    The court said that if parliament did not act the legal definition of marriage would be automatically changed to include same-sex unions.

    That would put South Africa alongside Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain and Canada in allowing gay marriages.

    Church leaders had have argued against the move, saying it
    flouted public opinion in the mainly Christian country, and
    called for a referendum on the divisive issue.

    Meanwhile lawyers for gay rights groups said they were disappointed that the court did not act to make gay marriages legal immediately. 

    "It's a bit disappointing. It feels like it's one step forward and still another one step backwards," said Keketso Maema, a lawyer for the Lesbian and Gay Equality project.

    "The good thing about this judgment is if parliament doesn't
    do anything in 12 months the word 'spouse' would be read into the marriage act. That gets us somewhere."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Explore how your country voted on global issues since 1946, as the world gears up for the 74th UN General Assembly.

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.