Climate talks pile pressure on US

The US is facing intensifying pressure at the UN climate-change meeting in Montreal to agree to open fresh talks on deepening cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions.

    Canadian PM Paul Martin hit out at the US in his speech

    With just hours left before the scheduled end to the 12-day parley, the US delegation on Friday had to decide whether to back or oppose a proposal put forward by Canada, the conference host.

    A draft of the document obtained by AFP describes climate change as "a serious challenge that has the potential to affect every part of the globe".

    It calls for "a dialogue on long-term cooperative action" under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the offshoot of the 1992 Rio Summit.

    It makes no specific reference to the key UNFCCC treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, which spells out action on tackling greenhouse gas pollution.

    Without prejudice

    The "dialogue (would be engaged) without prejudice to any future negotiations, commitments, process, framework or mandate under the UNFCCC," the document stresses.

    Agreement on the text was reached by a core group of negotiators pre-dawn Friday, but the US was absent.

    Some sources said earlier that Saudi Arabia was also absent, but this was contradicted later by others who said that the Saudis were in fact present and did not object to the deal.

    Montreal's summit heard public
    calls to prevent global warming

    The big question was whether the US would accept the document when the text was put to the conference later on Friday, the sources said.

    "We still have a problem," a UN official said, referring to the US.

    On Wednesday, the US expressed deep hostility to an earlier version of the proposal and said it would not shift from its belief that a voluntary approach, helped by smart technology, was the answer to tackling global warming.

    Adding to the potential for US objections, former US president Bill Clinton, who signed Kyoto for the US and is a hero to some green groups, was to attend the conference in a side event hosted by the City of Montreal.

    And the Canadian press reported on Friday that the US delegation was livid with a jab directed at Washington on Wednesday by Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, who called on the US to hear the "global conscience" on global warming.

    Kyoto discord

    US President George Bush's administration walked out of the UN's Kyoto Protocol on curbing greenhouse-gas pollution in 2001.

    It said the cost of meeting the treaty's legally binding caps on these emissions was too costly for its economy.

    US delegates have yet to sign on
    the summit's final declaration

    Kyoto's present commitment period runs out in 2012, but its outcome will at best make only a tiny advance against what is a gigantic problem.

    Almost as important as US participation is to get highly populous, fast-growing developing countries, such as China (the world's No 2 polluter) and India, in a closer cooperation.

    Under the present Kyoto format, only industrialised countries that have ratified the accord have to make specific emissions cuts in greenhouse gases.

    Moving away from fossils carries an economic price because of the need to improve fuel efficiency and switch to technology that may be cleaner but is also more expensive and largely untested.

    The ministerial level meeting culminated a 12-day gathering that has drawn 8700 participants.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.