Saudi reformists' trial adjourned

The trial of three Saudi reformists accused of calling for a constitutional monarchy has been adjourned for 20 days following a request by the prosecutor for more time to produce evidence.

    The three reformists had called for a constitutional monarchy

    The request to reconvene on 23 April was made on Saturday during a closed-door court session, according to Salih al-Khathlan, who represented the Saudi National Human Rights Association (NHRA) at the hearing.

    The trial of Ali al-Dimaini, Abd Allah al-Hamid and Matruk al-Falih, who have been held for more than a year, has been adjourned twice after a similar request by the prosecutor. 

    "We believe that such a delay is not necessary ... . All evidence should be available bearing in mind that the defendants were arrested more than a year ago," al-Khathlan said outside the court.

    Western terms

    Al-Dimaini, al-Hamid and al-Falih were arrested on 16 March 2004 on charges of demanding a constitutional monarchy in the ultra-conservative kingdom.

    The three, whose trial opened last August, are also accused of "using Western terminology" in demanding political reforms. Morever, they allegedly questioned the king's role as head of the judiciary.

    They have repeatedly refused to respond to the charges until the trial is made open to the public, but al-Dimaini decided on Saturday to present more than 25 pages in his defence, a relative attending the hearing told AFP.

    The courthouse was guarded by
    dozens of armed policemen

    Al-Dimaini decided to speak because he felt that the proceedings had "hit a brick wall" after the judge's decision not to admit the public, the relative said.

    "I do not want my demands for comprehensive political reform to be reduced to a mere request for an open trial," Dimaini told the judicial panel, according to the relative.

    Al-Khathlan said al-Dimaini addressed the panel for an hour and a half and that he argued his activities "were all within the framework of calling for reform" in the oil-rich kingdom.

    Al-Falih and al-Hamid, meanwhile, maintained they would not respond to the charges, at least until the trial is opened "to representatives of the media", relatives said.

    Defence argument

    "We believe that
    such a delay is not necessary ... . All evidence should be available bearing in
    mind that the defendants were arrested more
    than a year ago"

    Salih al-Khathlan,
    Saudi National Human Rights Association

    Dozens of armed policemen kept some 15 supporters more than 100 metres away from the courthouse entrance.

    The defendants were among more than 10 activists arrested at the time. The others were released in the same month after pledging to stop lobbying for reform in public.

    Abd al-Rahman al-Lahim, spokesman of the trio's defence team and who had repeatedly and publicly criticised judicial practices during the trial, was arrested in early November. He has yet to be charged.

    Al-Falih's relative Muhana al-Falih, who has been active in calling for the defendants' release, was also arrested in November without charge.

    The crackdown on constitutional reformists has cast doubt on the government's attempts to introduce limited reforms, claimed to fit Saudi specifications rather than following a Western pattern.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    The shocking story of Israel's disappeared babies

    The shocking story of Israel's disappeared babies

    New information has come to light about thousands of mostly Yemeni children believed to have been abducted in the 1950s.

    Stories from the sex trade

    Stories from the sex trade

    Dutch sex workers, pimps and johns share their stories.

    Inside the world of India's booming fertility industry

    Inside the world of India's booming fertility industry

    As the stigma associated with being childless persists, some elderly women in India risk it all to become mothers.