Blair was 'warned' of Iraq chaos

Prime Minister Tony Blair was warned by top British officials, including his foreign secretary, a year before invading Iraq that chaos could follow Saddam Hussein's ouster, according to a UK daily.

    Straw (L) sent a letter to Blair outlining his post-war concerns

    The Daily Telegraph reported on Saturday Foreign Secretary Jack Straw sent a letter in March 2002 marked "secret and personal" to Blair, seen by the paper, warning no one had prepared for what could happen afterwards.

    "There seems to be a larger hole in this (what would happen afterward) than anything," the daily quoted Straw as saying.

    "No one has satisfactorily answered how there can be any certainty that the replacement regime will be any better. Iraq has no history of democracy so no one has this habit or experience."

    Downing Street on Saturday said it would not comment on the leaked documents but, added the government "firmly believes that Iraq is a better place for the removal of Saddam Hussein."

    Damaging blow

    If found to be true, however, the leak is a damaging blow for Blair and shows the depth of opposition in his government to joining the US-led invasion in March 2003.

    "No one has satisfactorily answered how there can be any certainty that the replacement regime will be any better"

    Jack Straw, as quoted by The Daily Telegraph

    The paper said senior ministerial advisers warned in a "Secret UK Eyes Only" paper that success would only be achieved if the United States and others committed to "nation building for many years".

    "The greater investment of Western forces, the greater our control over Iraq's future, but the greater the cost and the longer we would need to stay," it said.

    Blair built a case for war on the basis that Baghdad possessed banned weapons of mass destruction, although no biological or chemical weapons have been found following Saddam's overthrow.

    'Unfinished business'

    But the Daily Telegraph said British officials believed US President George Bush instigated war because he wanted to complete his father's "unfinished business".

    A UK official called the invasion
    a Bush-Saddam 'grudge match'

    "Even the best survey of Iraq's WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) programme will not show much advance in recent years," a Foreign Office policy director said.

    "Military operations need clear and compelling military objectives. For Iraq 'regime change' does not stack up. It sounds like a grudge match between Bush and Saddam."

    The Foreign Affairs spokesman for Britain's third political party, the anti-war Liberal Democrat's Menzies Campbell, said, if accurate, the letters provided a "devastating insight" into the political run up to war.

    "They demonstrate that the government agreed with the Bush administration on regime change in Iraq more than a year before military action was taken," he said.

    "The British government has not come clean and been frank with the British people, either about regime change or the long-term troop commitment which would result if Saddam was removed."

    Bush's father was president during the first Gulf War when a US-led coalition freed Kuwait in 1991 and then drove Saddam's forces back deep into Iraq before withdrawing.

    SOURCE: Reuters


    'Money can't buy us': Mapping Canada's oil pipeline battle

    'Money can't buy us': Mapping Canada's oil pipeline battle

    We travel more than 2,000km and visit communities along the route of the oil pipeline that cuts across Indigenous land.

    Women under ISIL: The wives

    Women under ISIL: The wives

    Women married to ISIL fighters share accounts of being made to watch executions and strap explosives to other women.

    Diplomats for sale: How an ambassadorship was bought and lost

    Diplomats for sale: How an ambassadorship was bought and lost

    The story of Ali Reza Monfared, the Iranian who tried to buy diplomatic immunity after embezzling millions of dollars.