Australia accused of lying about Iraq

A group of more than 40 former Australian diplomats and defence chiefs has accused Prime Minister John Howard's government of deceiving the Australian people about the reasons for invading Iraq.

    Australia maintains about 850 troops in Iraq

    The open letter on Sunday echoed similar statements issued earlier in the year by retired US and British officials, making Australia the latest of the pro-war allies to face criticism from its own former diplomats.


    The statement said the electorate had been misled over the reasons for joining the US-led invasion of Iraq, and democracy could not work properly if people could not trust their elected representatives.


    "We are concerned that Australia was committed to join the invasion of Iraq on the basis of false assumptions and deception of the Australian people," the statement said.


    Wrong reason


    "Saddam's dictatorial regime has ended but removing him was not the reason given to the Australian people for going to war.


    Howard denies misleading the
    public over Iraq

    "The prime minister said in March 2003 that our policy was the disarmament of Iraq not the removal of Saddam Hussein."


    It said Australia's involvement had raised the country's profile as a "terrorist target".


    The statement was signed by former defence force chiefs Alan Beaumont and Peter Gration, former defence department secretary Paul Barratt, former prime minister's department secretaries Alan Renouf and Richard Woolcott as well as former ambassadors, including Rawdon Dalrymple, Stephen Fitzgerald and Ross Garnaut.


    Strong supporter


    Australia has been one of the strongest supporters of the Iraq campaign, committing about 2000 troops to last year's invasion and maintaining about 850 troops in and around the country.


    "Australian leaders must produce more carefully balanced policies and present them in more sophisticated ways"

    Australian ex-diplomats
    and defence chiefs

    Howard has repeatedly denied misleading the public about the invasion, saying intelligence at the time indicated Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.


    The signatories said they did not wish to endanger Australia's alliance with the US, but asserted that it should be a genuine partnership and not just a rubber stamp for policies decided in Washington.


    "Australian leaders must produce more carefully balanced policies and present them in more sophisticated ways," they wrote.


    In April, a group of former diplomats sent a letter to British Prime Minister Tony Blair savaging "doomed policies" in Iraq and the Middle East.


    The letter was echoed by retired US diplomatic and military officials in two separate letters in May and June accusing President George Bush of undermining US credibility in the Arab world and calling for him to be voted out over Iraq.



    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.