Rise in nuclear material smuggling

Scientists are concerned at the alarming increase in the smuggling of materials that could be used to make a crude radioactive bomb.

    A 'dirty bomb' could make an area uninhabitable for years

    Gloomy experts believe it is only a question of time before someone uses a device that would spew radioactive debris over a city, making parts of it uninhabitable for years, New Scientist says.

    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) records point to "a dramatic rise" in the smuggling of radiological substances coined "dirty bombs", the raw material for this bomb, the British science weekly says in next Saturday's issue.

    "In 1996, there were just eight of these incidents, but last year there were 51," the report says.

    "Most cases are believed to have occurred in Russia and elsewhere in Europe. Smugglers target the radioactive materials used in factories, hospitals and research laboratories, which are not guarded as securely as those used by the nuclear industry."

    A "dirty bomb" is not a nuclear bomb. It would use conventional explosive to disgorge radioactive material over a wide area, unleashing panic and making the area unusable.

    Illicit trafficking

    Since 1993, there have been 300 confirmed cases of illicit trafficking in radiological materials, 215 of them in the past five years.

    But, according to the IAEA documents, the true figure may be far higher. There have been 344 further suspected cases of trafficking over the past 11 years that have not been confirmed by any of the 75 states that monitor this activity.

    The agency adds that there are still 1000 radioactive sources that are unaccounted for in Iraq. And of 25 sources stolen from the Krakatau steel company in Indonesia in October 2000, only three have been recovered.

    A terrorist attack of this kind is "a nightmare waiting to happen," Frank Barnaby, a nuclear consultant and former British nuclear military scientist, was quoted by New Scientist as saying.

    "I'm amazed that it hasn't happened already."

    And last year, Eliza Manningham-Buller, director-general of the British counter-intelligence agency MI5, said a crude radiological attack against a major western city was "only a matter of time," the report said.

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    Interactive: Coding like a girl

    What obstacles do young women in technology have to overcome to achieve their dreams? Play this retro game to find out.

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    The War in October: What Happened in 1973?

    Al Jazeera examines three weeks of war from which both Arabs and Israelis claimed to emerge victorious.