UN to rule on cloning ban treaty

The General Assembly is due to decide on Monday whether to go ahead or to delay drafting a treaty banning all forms of human cloning including research involving the cloning of human cells.

    The horse clone, Prometea (L), was born in May 2003

    Strongly backed by the US anti-abortion movement and many predominantly Catholic nations, the campaign at the United Nations for a broad cloning ban has been led by the Bush administration and Costa Rica.
       
    Opponents of a broad ban want a narrower approach prohibiting only the cloning of a human being, an idea that has virtually universal support among the General Assembly's 191 member nations.

    But supporters of a broad global treaty rule out the option of a narrow approach, portraying so-called therapeutic cloning - in which cells from cloned human embryos are used in medical research - as the taking of human lives.
       
    In a setback for the White House, the assembly's legal committee decided by a one-vote margin last month to recommend that the writing of an international treaty banning cloning be put off for two years.

    Overturn attempts

    The legal panel's recommendation now comes up in the full General Assembly, whose membership is identical to that of the legal committee. But Costa Rica said last week it would try to overturn the panel's vote.
      
    Backers of the delay argued there should be a broad global consensus on the treaty's goals before work begins. 

    But the US maintains its supportive position of a total ban on human cloning, Richard Grenell, the spokesman for US Ambassador John Negroponte, told

    Negroponte stands for American  
    support of total ban on cloning

    Reuters news agency.
       
    "If the Costa Rican proposal comes up, we will vote for it," Grenell said.
       
    Supporters of a narrow human cloning ban, however, predicted the Costa Rica group would not gather the number of votes needed to prevail in the full General Assembly.

    Scientific interest

    The scientific community is lobbying UN missions to preserve the right to pursue therapeutic cloning, saying banning it would threaten a potentially promising field of research.
       
    While most scientists strongly oppose the cloning of a human being, "we must not allow those concerns to block medical advances that may some day be achieved through other kinds of research that involve cloned cells," said Alan Leshner, head of the Washington-based American Association for the Advancement of Science.
       
    The broad approach backed by the United States and Costa Rica would ban "efforts to use cloned embryonic stem cells to try and generate healthy tissues, or to treat degenerative
    diseases such as Parkinson's," he said.

    SOURCE: Reuters


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.