UN concerned over Iraq security

The UN secretary-general has vowed his organisation will not be driven out of Iraq.

    The US has been blamed for anarchy in Baghdad

    Kofi Annan was speaking two days after a bomb devastated the UN's Baghdad headquarters, killing 20 and injuring more than 100.

    Although Annan refused to blame the United States for the disaster, he emphasized America was responsible for security around the UN headquarters.

    "We had hoped that by now the coalition forces would have secured the environment for us to be able to carry on... economic reconstruction and institution building...

    That has not happened," he said.

    Mistakes

    "When you take on such a complex operation, one has to do planning ahead and I think there have been some wrong assumptions all along.

    "The coalition has made some mistakes and maybe we have made some mistakes too," he added. 

    However, the blast has cast doubt over the UN's future role in Iraq.

     

    UN spokesman Fred Eckhard said Annan had to assess whether "we are going full speed ahead or scaling back a bit".

    Evacuation

    At the moment, UN Baghdad staff are being evacuated while an alternative headquarters is being contemplated.

    Colin Powell will meet with Annan
    to discuss the UN's role in Iraq

    The United Nations has already suspended operations and has told anyone who wants to leave they can do so.

    Many others have been urged to leave Iraq for a rest "just so they can calm themselves down and better prepare themselves to resume their task", Eckhard said.

    Meanwhile,

    Annan is due to meet US Secretary of State Colin Powell and British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw on Thursday.

    Both officials have proposals for another UN resolution to encourage nations to send troops and police for security in Iraq.

    Ultimate control

    The United States is unlikely to cede any control in Iraq to the United Nations or other nations, although Britain is considering it. 

     

    One State Department official said Washington might be prepared to expand the UN's role, but only if the Security Council gave guarantees the United States would retain ultimate control.

    "A lot of things are being looked at with respect to mandates," an official said.

    "But whether we can work something out that satisfies everyone is up in the air."

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    Learn what India's parties' symbols mean by drawing them

    More than 2,300 political parties have registered for the largest electoral exercise in the world.

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Visualising every Saudi coalition air raid on Yemen

    Since March 2015, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of Arab states have launched more than 19,278 air raids across Yemen.

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    Why did Bush go to war in Iraq?

    No, it wasn't because of WMDs, democracy or Iraqi oil. The real reason is much more sinister than that.