Hindu bid to target Muslims and Christians

India's ruling Hindu nationalists have urged all political parties to end laws giving special treatment to Muslims and Christians.

    BJP leader Vajpayee has been accused of being anti-Muslim

    In a non-binding comment, the Supreme Court said this week that uniform civil laws for all Indians would foster integration.

     

    This judgement drew cheers from the Bharatiya Janata Party of Indian PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee which has long campaigned for common laws on marriage, divorce and inheritance.

       

    "It is sane advice, we hope all political parties will support such legislation," said BJP spokesman Vijay Kumar Malhotra on Thursday.

     

    "The common civil code will help the cause of national integration by removing contradictions based on ideology."

    Deeply divisive

    The issue of a common civil code for all Indians is a deeply sensitive and controversial one as it would affect, for example, the right of an Indian Muslim man to have more than one wife.

    At present, the Indian constitution allows members of different faiths to follow their own religious laws.

    The personal laws give Muslims the right to follow Islamic rules on polygamy and divorce, but also restrict Christians' rights to bequeath property for religious or charitable uses.

     

    "The common civil code will help the cause of national integration by removing contradictions based on ideology."

            Vijay Kumar Malhotra

    Meanwhile, Hindus are governed by a Hindu marriage act.

       

    The minorities fear a uniform code would mean being subject to Hindu laws, encroaching on their religious freedom.

     

    Discrimination

       

    Muslims constitute more than 12 percent of India's mainly Hindu billion-plus people and Christians about two percent.

       

    They have long accused the BJP of a deep-seated prejudice against them.

     

    But the BJP alone does not have the numbers to push such legislation through parliament and most opposition groups and even its own coalition partners oppose such a move.

           

    The main opposition Congress party, which campaigns on a secular agenda, reacted cautiously, saying it would study the court's remarks.

       

    "In general, we are for social change but we believe on such issues it should come from within society and not be imposed," party spokesman Satyavrat Chaturvedi said.

     

    Special treatment for minorities has been controversial issue since 1986, when Muslims forced the government to reverse a landmark ruling ordering payment of maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman.

       

    Muslim groups said the court had no right to interpret Muslim personal law, which only Islamic scholars could do.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Explore how your country voted on global issues since 1946, as the world gears up for the 74th UN General Assembly.

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.