Carbon Tracker: Vast majority of EU coal plants are unprofitable

Think-tank says European utility firms lose billions as polluting fossil fuels are phased out in favour of renewables.

by
    Coal plants in the EU have been closing, but many remain operational as the cost of their power climbs drastically when compared with other electricity sources [Ian Forsyth/Getty Images]
    Coal plants in the EU have been closing, but many remain operational as the cost of their power climbs drastically when compared with other electricity sources [Ian Forsyth/Getty Images]

    Four-fifths of coal-fired power plants in the European Union do not make money, says a new report from Carbon Tracker, a think-tank focused on the impact of climate change on financial markets.

    The study suggests that utilities in Europe could lose 6.6 billion euros ($7.3bn) this year alone from inefficient and highly polluting facilities.

    The report, Apocoalypse Now, recommends to policymakers and investors that coal should be fully phased out by 2030.

    Importantly, the research demonstrates that the coal industry cannot survive without major subsidies, amidst competition from affordable solar and wind power - in addition to cleaner and cheaper natural gas.

    The combination of strict air pollution regulations, falling renewable prices and rising carbon prices is making coal energy more and more unpalatable. In 2017, 46 percent of EU coal capacity was running at a loss. But now, the fraction has increased to 79 percent.

    Coal loss graphic
    Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) per megawatt-hour of EU coal power has decreased dramatically in the last two years, when factoring for long-run marginal costs that include the total price of fuel and carbon, as well as other variable and fixed expenses [Carbon Tracker]

    After analysing the economics of every EU coal-fired power plant, Carbon Tracker also found that Germany is the country most exposed to the decline of coal, followed by Spain and the Czech Republic.

    Matt Gray, co-author of the report and head of Power & Utilities at Carbon Tracker, said: "EU coal generators are haemorrhaging cash because they cannot compete with cheap renewables, and this will only get worse as carbon prices rise."

    RWE, Germany's second-largest electricity producer, is the firm looking at the greatest losses from coal - potentially 975 million euros ($1.08bn), or six percent of its market capitalisation.

    Prague-based EPH could lose 613 million euros ($681m), and PPC, in Greece, risks the loss of 596 million euros ($663m), according to the report.

    The press release accompanying the report said governments will face "intractable problems if they seek to support coal in the long term because they will have to choose whether to: pass costs to the utilities and destroy shareholder value; pass costs to consumers and push bills up; or fund them from debt or taxes".

    Coal Dilemma
    EU governments that stay 'pro-coal' could be forced to choose among corporate shareholder value, budget health and consumer wellbeing [Carbon Tracker]

    "The economics of coal generation in the EU are becoming untenable for operators without significant subsidies from the state," said the report. "Phasing out coal in a timely, cheap and just way will require considerable foresight."

    The report said the transition away from coal should minimise the odds "of a disorderly or delayed exit from value destruction or societal instability".

    But to be sure, some coal-fired power plants remain profitable, including a number in Poland that already receive significant government subsidies, as well as efficient units in the Netherlands and elsewhere. Some coal-fired power plants in Italy, Slovenia and other countries also benefit from high wholesale power prices.

    Yet the report warns that shareholders could increasingly take legal action if national governments begin to put more pressure on utility companies to move forward with uneconomic coal projects.

    Carbon Tracker - which is funded by a range of European and US foundations - argues that governments should loan money to fund the closure of coal-fired power plants, on the condition that utilities use those funds to build renewables and in turn repay the debt from future sales of power.

    In this model, utilities would always hire local workers and use some of their profits to help the communities transitioning off of coal - and other fossil fuels.

    Gray said that consumers, investors, workers and local communities stand to benefit from turning the page on a dirty energy source. "Getting off coal is cheap and can be a win-win."

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera News


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR



    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    Interactive: How does your country vote at the UN?

    We visualised 1.2 million votes at the UN since 1946. What do you think are the biggest issues facing the world today?

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    'We were forced out by the government soldiers'

    We dialled more than 35,000 random phone numbers to paint an accurate picture of displacement across South Sudan.

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Interactive: Plundering Cambodia's forests

    Meet the man on a mission to take down Cambodia's timber tycoons and expose a rampant illegal cross-border trade.