Your Views
How should international forces in Afghanistan be governed?

Afghanistan's cabinet has demanded a change in the rules governing international troops in the country, after more than 90 civilians were killed in US-led air attacks last week. It is the highest civilian death toll from international military action since US-led forces invaded in 2001. Should there be some kind of 'status of forces agreement' governing international troops in the country? Is there too much reliance on aerial attacks at the moment?

Published: 30 Sep 2008 07:24 GMT
Your Views is a place for lively debate and discussion on the issues affecting the world. In order to keep debates informative and accessible for all, we reserve the right to reject any messages which:
1. Are obscene or abusive
2. Make racist, sexist or homophobic comments or personal attacks on other users of the Your Views page
3. Break the law, or encourage others to do so, or are defamatory in breach of copyright or in contempt of court
4. Include personal details of any kind, such as phone numbers, email address or bank details
5. Are clearly advertising something for profit
6. Are impersonating someone else
7. Are irrelevant to the topic being discussed or are being repeatedly posted

Featured on Al Jazeera
Murder of Somali draws ire of foreign African nationals over rising xenophobic violence.
We look at the impact of increased sanctions against the Islamic Republic and ask who it really affects.
Tupamaros enforce rough justice in Venezuela's slums to support socialism, but critics say the group are violent thugs.
More than a decade ago the US launched a war against Afghanistan, but was it a justified battle?