[QODLink]
Football
No ‘credible basis’ for John Terry defence
English Football Association deems Chelsea captain's racism defence 'not credible' but conclude he is not a racist.
Last Modified: 05 Oct 2012 14:15
Terry admitted using the offensive words during a match last year, but claimed he had only been repeating the words he thought Anton Ferdinand had accused him of saying [EPA]

The English Football Association have released their report explaining why they rejected Chelsea captain John Terry's defence and found the player guilty of racially insulting Queens Park Rangers defender Anton Ferdinand last year.

The FA published a 63-page document on Friday giving the reasons that led them to impose a four-match ban and $355,600 fine last week for an incident that occurred during a Premier League match at QPR's Loftus Road ground.

Terry, who has until October 18 to appeal against the ban and fine, was found not guilty of a racially aggravated offence towards Ferdinand by London magistrates in July.

The FA, who held their own inquiry into the incident, ruled they did not believe Terry was a racist, but they rejected his defence and said they had no doubt he racially abused Ferdinand in the game, after being provoked by the QPR player.

Full report

In the document, the FA said there was "no credible basis" for the Chelsea skipper's defence that he was only repeating words he believed the QPR defender had said to him.

Terry admitted using the word "black" surrounded by highly offensive swear words during the match but claimed he had only been repeating words he thought Ferdinand had accused him of saying.

In its full written report on the verdict, the FA's independent regulatory commission said it was satisfied the words were intended as an insult by Terry.

The document states: "The commission is quite satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that there is no credible basis for Mr Terry's defence that his use of the words 'f****** black c***' were directed at Ferdinand by way of forceful rejection and/or inquiry.

"Instead, we are quite satisfied, and find on the balance of probabilities, that the offending words were said by way of insult.

"We are able to arrive at that decision without needing to make any adverse findings against Mr Terry arising out of his decision not to give evidence."

Commenting on the character references that were provided by his Chelsea team-mates, the FA conclude that "it is accepted by everyone involved in the criminal and disciplinary proceedings that Mr. Terry is not a racist".

The FA decided to ban the 31-year-old on the basis that the commission was satisfied the words were intended as an insult.

413

Source:
Reuters
Topics in this article
People
City
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Israel's Operation Protective Edge is the third major offensive on the Gaza Strip in six years.
Muslims and Arabs in the US say they face discrimination in many areas of life, 13 years after the 9/11 attacks.
At one UN site alone, approximately four children below the age of five are dying each day.
Featured
Growing poverty is strengthening a trend among UK Muslims to fund charitable work closer to home.
A groundbreaking study from Johns Hopkins University shows that for big segments of the US population it is.
Critics claim a vaguely worded secrecy law gives the Japanese government sweeping powers.
A new book looks at Himalayan nation's decades of political change and difficult transition from monarchy to democracy.
The Church of Christ built a $200m megachurch while analysts say members vote in a block.
join our mailing list