[QODLink]
Middle East
Palestinians reject Israeli terms
Anger after Netanyahu rules out Palestinian control of their own borders and security.
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2009 01:32 GMT

Netanyahu said he would seek guarantees that the Palestinians would not be allowed an army [AFP]

Palestinian officials have condemned a major policy speech by Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, saying it had "closed the door" on moves to reach an agreement between the two sides.

In his address, Netanyahu gave the slightest of nods to the creation of a Palestinian state, an issue he has avoided since taking power in April, but with a host of conditions attached.

"Netanyahu's speech closed the door to permanent status negotiations,'' Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians' senior negotiator, said.

"We ask the world not to be fooled by his use of the term Palestinian state because he qualified it. He declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel, said refugees would not be negotiated and that settlements would remain."

"The peace process has been moving at the speed of a turtle. Tonight, Netanyahu has flipped it over on its back," he said.

Netanyahu speech

Netanyahu told an audience at Bar-Ilan University in Tel Aviv on Sunday that he would require international guarantees that any Palestinian state would have no army or control of its airspace and borders, and would recognise Israel as a Jewish state.

In depth


 
Profile: Binyamin Netanyahu
 Full text of Netanyahu's speech
 Analysis: Limiting a Palestinian state
 Video: Settlers applaud Netanyahu's speech
 Q&A: Jewish settlements
 Netanyahu on peace
 Riz Khan: The battle over Israeli settlements
 Riz Khan: The future of US-Israeli relations
 Inside Story: Roads and obstacles to peace
 Inside Story: US and Israel poles apart

"If we receive this guarantee ... then we will be ready in a future peace agreement to reach a solution where a demilitarised Palestinian state exists alongside the Jewish state," he said.

"Israel needs defensible borders, and Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel with continued religious freedom for all faiths."

The so-called "road map" towards a two-state solution, which was agreed by the two sides in 2003, talks of a sovereign Palestinian state within the pre-1967 borders, which would include the east Jerusalem as well as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Mustafa Barghouti, an independent Palestinian MP, told Al Jazeera that by applying the conditions, Netanyahu had effectively refused the formation of a Palestinian state.

"He wants to substitute a Palestinian state for a ghetto with no sovereignty, with no control of its land, of its resources, of its passage, of its roads, of its airspace, of its borders," he said.

"This is a game, he just used the word state to mislead the world."

The United States and European Union - both members of the so-called Quartet of Middle East mediators - gave a cautious welcome to Netanyahu's speech.

Robert Gibbs, a White House spokesman, said that Netanyahu had made "an important step forward" and reiterated Washington's committment to a Palestinian state "in the historic homeland of both peoples".

Jan Kohout, the Czech foreign minister, who's country holds the rotating presidency of the EU, said that speech was "a step in the right direction".

"Of course, there are a number of other elements which need to be analysed, but the acceptance of the Palestinian state is there," he said.

Settlements issue

However, Netanyahu refused to concede to US demands for a complete halt to all settlement expansion, as set out in the "road map".  

"We have no intention of building new settlements or of expropriating additional land for existing settlements," he said.

Palestinian objections

 Netanyahu's 'Palestinian state' would not include east Jerusalem, which was annexed by Israel after the 1967 Middle East war and is seen by the Palestinians as their future capital

 It would not have many of the normal trappings of statehood under the vision: control of their own borders, airspace, a military and the right to sign treaties with other nations

 Netanyahu refused to freeze all settlement activity in the West Bank, which it also occupied in 1967, despite US pressure and Israel agreeing to such a move in the 2003 "road map"

 He stated that Palestinian families displaced from lands that are now in Israel would not be able to return, a key demand for the Palestinians

"But there is a need to enable the residents to live normal lives, to allow mothers and fathers to raise their children like families elsewhere." 

The Israeli prime minister also urged the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank to re-establish "the rule of law" over the rival Hamas movement, which seized full control of the Gaza Strip two years ago. 

"The Palestinians must decide between the path of peace and the path of Hamas," he said.

"Israel will not sit at the negotiating table with terrorists who seek their destruction."

Sami Abu Zuhri, a Hamas spokesman, dismissed Netanyahu's comments and said that the Palestinians would continue to fight for their rights.

"His racist speech and his policy on the ground - the extention of Jewish influence in Jerusalem, settlements in the West Bank and the siege in Gaza - proves he is lying about his desire for peace," he said.

"He will never trick us and we will continue to demand our rights and our Palestinian lands."

Israel and the Palestinians relaunched peace negotiations at the Annapolis conference in the US in November 2007, but the talks made little progress and were suspended during Israel's war on Gaza last December and January.

The Palestinians have said that they will not restart negotiations unless Netanyahu publicly backs a two-state solution and stops the building of Jewish settlements on Palestinian land.

Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
City
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go