[QODLink]
Middle East
Blair defends Saddam's removal
Iraqi leaders assured of continued British support after UK PM leaves office in June.
Last Modified: 19 May 2007 15:59 GMT
Blair told Talabani and al-Maliki that Britain would continue to support Iraq after his departure [AFP]

Tony Blair has said on his last visit to Iraq as the British prime minister that he has no regrets about his part in the US-led invasion that removed Saddam Hussein.
 
On a farewell trip to a country whose future may define his legacy, Blair held talks with his Iraqi counterpart and the president in Baghdad before travelling to Basra.
Blair told a joint news conference with Nuri al-Maliki and Jalal Talabani: "I have no regrets about removing Saddam, no."
 
As he arrived in the Iraqi capital, three mortar shells or rockets struck Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone where he met Iraq's leaders.
Two rounds of either mortars or rockets landed while he chatted with British troops stationed in Basra, witnesses said.

Security improving

Lou Fintor, a US embassy spokesman, said the attack on the Green Zone wounded one person.

Security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said one round hit the British embassy compound.

It was not known if Blair was in the embassy at the time, but he appeared to refer to the attack during the news conference.

He said: "There are mortar attacks and terrorist attacks happening every day. We don't give in to them."

Final visit

Blair, who was on his seventh and final visit to Iraq, said he believed security was improving in Iraq, but acknowledged violence was still a daily occurrence.

Your Views

"Blair has been made a scapegoat for British foreign policy regarding Iraq"

surfdog1958, Baton Rouge, US 

Send us your views

He said: "Iraq was liberated from the terrible dictatorship of Saddam (Hussein) and now there are attempts to oppress it in a different ways with terrorism and violence."

Blair said he had told al-Maliki and Talabani that Britain would continue to support them after he left office in June.

He urged them to increase efforts to bring tribal leaders and others linked to violence into the political process.

However, he did not win an agreement from the Iraqi leaders to hold new provincial elections.

'Right direction'

A British spokesman said: "We can't speak for them, but we are confident they are moving in the right direction on elections."

Blair had hoped provincial elections could take place in 2007 and that Sunni groups, who boycotted the last similar poll, would field candidates, the spokesman said.

The spokesman said multinational force officials are cautiously optimistic over evidence that some tribal leaders in Anbar province have ousted al-Qaeda-linked fighters hiding in their communities.

He said Britain did not favour talks with foreign terrorists but would support moves to bring those whose violence was motivated by "concerns about whether their community will have a place in the new Iraq" into the political sphere.

Plea to neighbours

Blair said: "The future of Iraq should be determined by Iraqis in accordance with their wishes and it is important that all the neighbouring countries understand and respect that.
   
"We know it is important to work with Iran but Iran has to understand it cannot support terrorism and want to work with us at the same time."

In a rare meeting, ambassadors from Iran and the US will meet in Iraq on May 28 to discuss security in the country.

Meanwhile, speaking on the BBC, Jimmy Carter, the former US president, said on Saturday that Blair could have exerted greater influence over Bush, and his government had shown "subservience" towards the White House over Iraq and other foreign policy areas.

He said: "I have been really disappointed in the apparent subservience of the British government's policies related to many of the serious mistakes that have been originated in Washington."

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go