Scientists criticise EU's Human Brain Project

Almost 200 neuro-scientists say $1.6b bid to recreate human-brain function on supercomputers will waste too much money.

    Scientists criticise EU's Human Brain Project
    HBR project's head says protesting scientists do not understand the venture enough [Human Brain Project]

    Almost 200 neuro-scientists are protesting Europe's $1.6bn attempt to recreate the functioning of the human brain on supercomputers, fearing it will waste vast amounts of money and harm neuroscience in general.

    The 10-year Human Brain Project is largely funded by the European Union.

    In an open letter issued on Monday, the neuroscience researchers called on the EU to put less money into the effort to "build" a brain, and to invest instead in existing projects.

    The project involves 112 institutions across Europe and the pooling, sharing and organisation of their data on brain research. That information will be used to reconstruct the workings of a human brain on computers.

    If the EU does not adopt their recommendations, the scientists said, they will boycott the Human Brain Project and urge colleagues to do the same.

    Ryan Heath, EU spokesman, called for patience, and said it was too early to say whether the project is a success because it had only been under way for nine months.

    He said the EU plans to rigorously review the scientific progress made and the project's management every year.

    Henry Markram, who heads the Human Brain Project at the Swiss Federal Institute for Technology in Lausanne, suggested those who signed the letter of protest did so because they did not understand the venture.

    In an interview, he said the project, established in 2013, would bundle the work of some 100,000 neuroscientists worldwide the way that CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, has done for particle physics.

    He acknowledged the brain project may have done a poor job telling scientists how they may benefit, even if they are not directly involved.

    "I think we need to communicate more that it's going to actually help them get more funding,'' Markram said.

    "They feel that money is being taken away, that it's going to distract from the important work that they're doing. There is really not a threat."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    The woman who cleans up after 'lonely deaths' in Japan

    The woman who cleans up after 'lonely deaths' in Japan

    When somebody dies lonely and alone, Miyu Kojima steps in to clean their home and organise the mementos of their life.

    Putin and the 'triumph of Christianity' in Russia

    Putin and the 'triumph of Christianity' in Russia

    The rise of the Orthodox Church in Russia appears unstoppable, write filmmakers Glen Ellis and Viktoryia Kolchyna who went to investigate the close ties between the church and Putin.

    The chill effect: Is India's media running scared?

    The chill effect: Is India's media running scared?

    Much of India's media spurns a scoop about the son of PM Modi's right-hand man. Plus, NFL as platform for race politics.