UK spymasters defend surveillance tactics

Intelligence bosses say they are not compromising freedom as they give public evidence in parliament for the first time.

    UK spymasters defend surveillance tactics
    In the past, hearings involving UK intelligence chiefs have been behind closed doors [Getty Images]

    Britain's spy chiefs defended their activities as they gave public, televised evidence to British MPs for the first time amid a fierce debate over intelligence tactics following leaks of mass spying on citizens and foreign allies.

    Andrew Parker and John Sawers, the heads of Britain's domestic agency MI5 and its foreign spy service MI6, and the director of the GCHQ, Iain Lobban, fielded questions from Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee on Thursday.

    Parker defended his spies, and their methods. "The suggestion that somehow what we do is somehow compromising freedom and democracy - we believe the opposite to be the case,'' he said.

    Leaks by the US whistleblower Edward Snowden showed that British spies are involved in mass surveillance of the communications and internet activities of British citizens, hoovering up the details of tens of millions of calls and messages a month. They also spied on foreign allies and shared their information with counterparts in the United States.

    No evidence

    "The leaks from Snowden have been very damaging, they've put our operations at risk. It's clear that our adversaries are rubbing their hands with glee, al-Qaeda is lapping it up,"  Sawers told the committee.

    British spy agencies have provided no information to the public how Snowden's revelations have harmed their activities. Nor have they proved how spying on millions of British citizens, foreigners and foreign governments has given them any advantage against their adversaries.

    Lobban came closest to giving a concrete example at the hearing, saying that GCHQ had caught groups in the Middle East and elsewhere discussing how to switch to more secure means of communication after the Snowden leaks broke. 

    "I am not going to compound the damage by being specific in public," he said, instead promising politicians a private briefing on the details.

    The committee previously has taken evidence in private from the security chiefs. Their appearance on Thursday was being televised with a slight delay.

    SOURCE: Reuters


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    The many ways in which the assassination of the North Korean leader could lead to a total disaster.

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The man we call 'Salman Rushdie' today is not the brilliant author of the Satanic Verses, but a Picassoesque imposter.

    Why does Israel keep attacking Syria?

    Why does Israel keep attacking Syria?

    Al Jazeera examines what is behind the cross-border violence and threats between Israel and Syria.