UK sets up panel for torture probe

Inquiry to examine if UK spies were complicit in torture of terrorism suspects held overseas.

    Cameron said the allegations had 'brought a stain' on Britain's reputation [AP]

    'Demonstrably independent'

    Addressing parliament on Tuesday, Cameron said the inquiry would begin once related criminal investigations and civil law suits have been dealt with.

    "We hope it will start before the end of this year and will report within a year," he said.

    "An inquiry done well can help ensure that British abuses are not repeated and restore Britain’s reputation as an anti-torture champion"

    Tom Porteous,
    Human Rights Watch

    The prime minister, who said the allegations had "brought a stain" on Britain's reputation, said that Gibson would decide whether parts of the inquiry can be held in public.

    Tom Porteous, UK director of Human Rights Watch, said: "This inquiry must be demonstrably independent, comprehensive and to the greatest extent possible public.

    "An inquiry done well can help ensure that British abuses are not repeated and restore Britain’s reputation as an anti-torture champion."

    Cameron's ruling Conservative party and its coalition partner the Liberal Democrats came to power in May.

    The two parties had long called for an investigation into the torture claims during the previous Labour government.

    'Devil in the detail'

    The allegations include those by Ethiopian-born Binyam Mohamed, who came to Britain in 1994 seeking asylum. He alleged he was questioned in Morocco in 2002 by people using information that could only have come from the British intelligence service.

    Mohamed was arrested in Pakistan in 2002 while trying to return to Britain and spent nearly seven years in US custody or in countries taking part in the US-run rendition programme.

    After a lengthy campaign by his supporters, he became the first prisoner to be released from Guantanamo Bay under the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, and returned to Britain in February last year.

    Clive Stafford Smith, Mohamed's lawyer, said that the inquiry should be held in public.

     "This inquiry is welcome but the devil is in the detail: the idea that this inquiry must be heard in private is misguided and wrong," he said. 

    "For too long our politicians have confused national security with national embarrassment. This creeping secrecy is the scourge of any open democracy and must be stopped if we are to rebuild trust in our government and our reputation overseas."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.