[QODLink]
Europe
UK extends 'terrorism' legislation
Parliament narrowly votes in favour of increasing pre-charge detention for suspects.
Last Modified: 12 Jun 2008 11:13 GMT
Human rights group Liberty accused the government of exaggerating the need for an extension [AFP] 
Britain's prime minister has won a parliamentary vote to extend the time the authorities can hold people on suspicion of "terrorist" activities without charging them.
 
Parliament on Wednesday voted 315 to 306 in favour of Gordon Brown's plan to extend the pre-charge detention time limit to 42 days from 28 days.
Opposition within Gordon Brown's own party slashed the government's majority to just nine.

Brown is said to have personally intervened with backbench waverers to ensure he carried the vote.
There was also talk, hotly denied, of a deal with the nine members of parliament from Northern Ireland's largest Protestant party the Democratic Unionist Party.

Last-minute effort

Mark Seddon, Al Jazeera's correspondent at Westminster, said: "The prime minister was actually telephoning people asking them to vote. It was a knife edge.
 
"Ministers utterly failed to provide the evidence in favour of
42 days in
the Commons"


David David, opposition spokesman
"There's already a post-mortem taking place looking at what these MPs might have been offered to get them onboard. The House of Lords, parliament's second chamber, is now likely to vote against the extension and it is likely to ping-pong between the two houses."

Thirty-six members of Brown's Labour Party still rebelled, despite last-minute concessions from the government and the personal interventions of senior party figures.

"Securing votes by threats, bribes and personal pleading demeans the role of the prime minister," John McDonnell, one Labour MP who opposed the bill, said.

David Davis, home affairs spokesman for the opposition Conservative party, accused the government of having "bought the votes".
  
"Ministers utterly failed to provide the evidence in favour of 42 days in the Commons and the measure is likely to be rejected in the House of Lords," he said.

'Exaggerated claims'
 
Before the vote took place, Liberty, the UK-based human rights group, accused the government of exaggerating claims of the need for an extension.

Liberty said that even the current limit of 28 days far exceeds pre-charge detention limits in 14 other comparable democracies, including France, Spain, Turkey and the United States, which have all suffered attacks.
 
Tony Blair, Brown's predecessor, tried and failed to increase the pre-charge detention limit from the then-maximum 14 days to 90 days after the July 2005 suicide attacks in London.
 
Lord Peter Goldsmith, Blair's former chief legal adviser, said that the
extension would strain relations with Britain's Muslim communities and could choke the flow of information on which police and intelligence officers rely to foil attacks.
 
Defeat would have been damaging for Brown at a time when his poll ratings are at record lows and some Labour MPs are openly questioning his suitability to lead the party into a general election due to be held by May 2010.
Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go