[QODLink]
Europe
G8 reaches climate change deal
Agreement the make "substantial cuts" and post-Kyoto deal by 2009 reached.
Last Modified: 07 Jun 2007 15:28 GMT
The world's leading industrialised nations have pledged to act to cut global warming gases [EPA]

World leaders at the G8 summit have sealed an agreement in which they will make "substantial" cuts in greenhouse gases and secure a post-Kyoto protocol deal by 2009.

 

Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, said: "We agreed on clear language ... that recognises CO2 emissions must first be stopped and followed by substantial reductions."

In what she said was "a clear commitment to continue the UN climate process", G8 countries meeting in the Baltic resort of Heiligendamm had agreed to "consider" her aim for a 50 per cent cut in emissions by 2050.

 

At this stage, leaders have not committed to any specific targets.

Your Views

"The G8 summit is nothing but media attention and wasted money"

Politics, Cambridge, UK

Send us your views

"Many countries moved on this issue," Merkel said on Thursday, adding the accord gave impetus to negotiations beginning in Bali in December to find a successor to the UN-backed Kyoto protocol on capping greenhouse gases that expires in 2012.

 

Merkel said that talks on a post-Kyoto pact would take place within the framework of the UN.

 

The deal is the most serious commitment to action on climate change by the US, the world's largest global warmer.

 

Washington had initially resisted attempts by Merkel to set a goal for cuts needed to combat a warming of the Earth's surface, which many scientists say will cause sea levels to rise, and more droughts and floods.

 

But she secured a partial victory by securing an inclusion of the target in a document put out to summit leaders.

 

Environmentalists critical

Environmentalists, however, have condemned the G8's failure to agree on specific, binding goals.

 

Neil Adger of the UK's Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, said: "Agreeing on a numerical target is a significant first step, and not taking that first step is going to condemn us to a lot of pain and suffering in terms of the impacts of climate change."

While Daniel Mittler of Greenpeace said that Bush had not agreed to anything worthwhile.


"He has agreed to seriously consider [the goal of cutting gas emissions by 50 per cent by 2050], which I think we can translate as, 'Bush will watch while the rest of the world acts'".


"Bush has rejected binding emission cuts, which is what is really necessary."

 

Merkel is hosting three days of talks at a Baltic coast resort with counterparts from Britain, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Russia and the US.

 

Missile confrontation

 

Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and George Bush, the US president, have also begun talks on the sidelines of the G8 summit amid a dispute over a US missile defence system.

 

Merkel, centre, is hosting the talks [EPA]
Russia has been angered by the US plan for a missile defence system in Central Europe, while Bush has accused Putin's government of seeking to roll back democratic reforms.

 

On Thursday, Bush said that the missile shield dispute was "not something we should hyperventilate about".

 

Russia believes it is the sole target of the US missile shield, which would be in Poland and the Czech Republic, and Putin has threatened to aim Russian missiles at European targets if the deployment goes ahead.

 

Bush said he was "looking forward" to meeting Putin despite the dispute.

 

"I will explain to him once again that a missile defence shield is aimed at a rogue regime that may try to hold Russia and or Europe hostage.

 

"It is important for Russia and the Russians to understand that I believe the Cold War ended, that Russia is not an enemy of the United States, that there's a lot of areas where we can work together."

Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go