[QODLink]
Central & South Asia
Kerry against Afghan troop build-up
US senator says it will be "irresponsible" to deploy more US troops to Afghanistan.
Last Modified: 18 Oct 2009 04:58 GMT
Obama is weighing a request for tens of thousands more troops for Afghanistan [AFP]

John Kerry, the US senate's foreign relations committee chairman, has said it would be "irresponsible" to send more US troops to Afghanistan.

Kerry's comments on Saturday came as a deepening election crisis that has placed the Kabul government's legitimacy at stake continues.

"It would be entirely irresponsible for the president of the United States to commit more troops to this country, when we don't even have an election finished and know who the president is and what kind of government we're working in, with," said Kerry.

"When our own commanding general tells us that a critical component of achieving our mission here is, in fact, good governance, and we're living with a government that we know has to change and provide it, how could the president responsibly say, 'Oh, they asked for more, sure - here they are'?"

The senator had travelled to Afghanistan to meet General Stanley McChrystal, the chief US and Nato commander who has recommended a radical change in US strategy there.

Karzai besieged

Before Saturday's comments, Kerry had said to to McChrystal's recommendation: "I don't know the answer to that question ... I am very wary of it because of past experience and because of some of the challenges that I see."

In depth

Video: Regional impact of US strategy in Afghanistan
Video: Afghanistan advisers warned
 
Focus: Afghan war 'needs regional plan'
 Focus: 'Al-Qaeda facilitates insurgency'
 Riz Khan: Eight years of war in Afghanistan

He said neither of the two extremes - a nationwide counterinsurgency and nation-building effort in Afghanistan nor "walking away from the place" - were do-able.

Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president,  has been plagued by uncertainty and questions of legitimacy after allegations of fraud in the August elections, whose preliminary results put him on top.

Speaking to CBS television, Kerry said he did not see how Obama "can make a decision about the committing of our additional forces, or even the further fulfillment of our mission that's here today, without an adequate government in place or knowledge about what that government's going to be".

He said it was time for Karzai to "step up" and explain how they could be a viable partner in the US and Nato-led mission to rout out Taliban fighters and build a stable Afghanistan eight years into the war.

Al-Qaeda threat

"The key in Afghanistan is we have got to figure out what is achievable, measured against the legitimate interests of the US, primary among which is al-Qaeda," Kerry said.

"In Afghanistan itself we have to resolve the question of whether the Taliban are per se a threat to us."

In talks last Wednesday between Barack Obama, the US president, and his top advisers on a new strategy for Afghanistan, some aides emphasised the main threat to US interests was al-Qaeda, not the Taliban.

The administration's analysis of the threat posed by the Taliban could play a role in whether Obama accepts part or all of McChrystal's request for extra troops, beyond the 68,000 he has already approved for this year.

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go