[QODLink]
Central & South Asia
UN extends Nato-led Afghan mission
Security Council expresses concern over increased Taliban and al-Qaeda attacks.
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2007 03:26 GMT
There are about 40,000 ISAF troops in Afghanistan [EPA]
The UN Security Council has authorised the extension of Nato-led troops in Afghanistan for another year as it recognised contributions from Nato and other countries in the fight against the Taliban.
The resolution on Wednesday extended the mandate because of concerns over "the increased violent and terrorist activities by the Taliban, al-Qaeda, illegally armed groups and those involved in the narcotics trade".
The authorisation for the expansion of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) was extended for a year beyond October 13.
 
The ISAF has close to 40,000 troops in Afghanistan since the Taliban rulers were toppled in 2001.
 
The US maintains about 13,000 troops in a separate counter-insurgency force.
 
Abstention
 
The council voted 14-0 with Russia abstaining because of a reference to Japan's naval mission supporting US-led forces in Afghanistan, an issue which has caused a political storm in Japan.
 
Vitaly Churkin, Russia's UN ambassador, said the resolution "should not have given priority to domestic considerations".
 
China also criticised the resolution, although it voted in favour.
 
The move comes as Nato forces launched a major operation in southern Afghanistan to clear Taliban fighters from one of the most violent provinces in the country.
 
About 2,500 soldiers were deployed to Helmand's upper Gereshk valley, where violence has soared this year with daily clashes throughout the summer.
 
Wednesday's resolution also recognised the need to further strengthen ISAF, asking countries "to contribute personnel, equipment and other resources".
 
The council strongly condemned suicide attacks, abductions and other violence against civilians and international forces.
Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go