Kyrgyz leader boosts his powers

Bakiyev rebels against deputies to gain parliamentary vote for executive powers.

    Opposition leaders accused Bakiyev of failing to keep promises made during his "tulip revolution" [EPA]

    Reinstated power

     

    Shortly after he spoke, parliament voted 50 to one to reinstate Bakiyev's right to appoint the prime minister and government, as well as all regional governors.

     

    Opposition deputies boycotted the vote.

     

    Bakiyev, elected by a landslide last year after the previous Kyrgyz leader, Askar Akayev, fled amid a violent coup, also won back control over the army and security services.

     

    Protests

     

    After a wave of street protests staged by the opposition last month, the president signed a new constitution that would have cut his powers and given the legislature the ability to appoint a new government.

     

    After the protests, Kyrgyzstan could have become the first state in authoritarian post-Soviet Central Asia where parliament has strong checks and balances on the president.

     

    On Monday, however, deputies blocked an attempt to reinstate Bakiyev's powers, which angered the president and caused him to call parliament to vote on the matter.

     

    Strategically located Kyrgyzstan, which hosts Russian and US military bases, has been without a formal government since Felix Kulov, the prime minister, resigned this month in response to the constitutional changes.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera and agencies.


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    What happens when the US government shuts down?

    The US government has shut down. What happens next?

    US federal government begins partial shutdown after Senate blocks short-term spending bill. What happens next?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Is an empowered Palestinian girl not worthy of Western feminist admiration?