[QODLink]
Americas

Manning sentencing hearing gets under way

Judge will hear more than 20 witnesses in the hearing of US soldier accused of leaking government secrets.

Last Modified: 31 Jul 2013 14:29
Email Article
Print Article
Share article
Send Feedback
Manning was acquitted of aiding the enemy, the most serious charge levelled against him [EPA]

The sentencing hearing of US soldier Bradley Manning, which begins on Wednesday at Fort Meade, near Baltimore, is likely to last several weeks, legal experts say.

Judge Colonel Denise Lind will hear testimony from more than 20 defence and prosecution witnesses, who are expected to weigh in on Manning's motives and the effects of leaking government secrets.

Manning was acquitted on Tuesday of aiding the enemy - the most serious charge levelled against him - but he was found guilty of leaking classified government documents and 19 other counts, including espionage and theft, for his 2010 national security leaks to WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organisation.

Manning faces a maximum penalty of 136 years in prison.

After the verdict was announced on Tuesday, experts assessed Manning's legal recourse.

"This case is going to be reviewed automatically, and will likely be in the appeals process for several years," Yale military law professor Eugene Fidell told Al Jazeera.

Manning "would have a very good appellate argument if convicted of aiding the enemy," he said, adding that he "wouldn’t speculate, for the time being, on what [Manning's] arguments would be".

The American Civil Liberties Union called Tuesday's decision a gesture to scare future whistleblowers.

"Since Manning already pleaded guilty to charges of leaking information – which carry significant punishment – it seems clear that the government was seeking to intimidate anyone who might consider revealing valuable information in the future," the ACLU said in a statement emailed to Al Jazeera.

'Dangerous precedent'

Meanwhile, Julian Assange, whose WikiLeaks organisation revealed Manning's data dump to the world, reacted negatively to the verdict.

"It is a dangerous precedent and an example of national security extremism," he told reporters at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, which is sheltering him. "This has never been a fair trial."

Judge Lind's verdict follows about two months of testimony and evidence. Manning, a 25-year-old native of Oklahoma, admitted to sending more than 470,000 Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports, 250,000 State Department diplomatic cables and other material, including several battlefield video clips, to WikiLeaks while in Iraq in early 2010. WikiLeaks published most of the material online.

The video elements included footage of a 2007 US Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed at least nine men, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

The WikiLeaks case is by far the most voluminous release of classified material in US history.

Manning said he sent the material to expose war crimes and deceitful foreign policy and that he didn't believe the information he handed over would harm troops in Afghanistan and Iraq or threaten national security.

21st century warfare

In closing arguments last week, defence attorney David Coombs portrayed Manning as a naive whistleblower who never intended for the material to be seen by the enemy. 

J.D. Gordon, Former Defence Department Spokesman told Al Jazeera that Manning "should certainly face life in prison. I think he's a traitor. I think he represents 21st century warfare".

"Bradley Manning decided he would be the judge, jury and executioner to damage the United States," Gordon said, adding that "Manning’s material was used an enemy propaganda campaign."

Prosecutors described the young soldier as an anarchist hacker and traitor who indiscriminately leaked classified information he had sworn to protect. They said al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden obtained copies of some of the documents WikiLeaks published before he was killed by Navy Seals in 2011.

In bringing the charge against Manning, prosecutors cited the Civil War-era court-martial of Pvt. Henry Vanderwater, a Union soldier convicted in 1863 of aiding the enemy by giving a Virginia newspaper a command roster that was then published.

Coombs countered that the Civil War-era cases involved coded messages disguised as advertisements. He said all modern cases involve military members who gave the enemy information directly.

Additional reporting by Massoud Hayoun

631

Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
Email Article
Print Article
Share article
Send Feedback
Topics in this article
People
Country
City
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
More than one-quarter of Gaza's population has been displaced, causing a humanitarian crisis.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Muslim charities claim discrimination after major UK banks began closing their accounts.
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Featured
Frustration grows in Kiev as pledges to end corruption and abuse of power stagnate after Maidan Square protest.
Thousands of Houthi supporters have called for the fall of Yemen's government. But what do the Houthis really want?
New ration reductions and movement restrictions have refugees from Myanmar anxious about their future in Thailand.
US lawyers say poor translations of election materials disenfranchise Native voters.
US drones in Pakistan have killed thousands since 2004. How have leaders defended or decried these deadly planes?
join our mailing list