[QODLink]
Americas
US appeals court backs Obama healthcare law
District of Columbia panel says Congress did not overstep powers in requiring people to have insurance or face penalty.
Last Modified: 09 Nov 2011 09:22
Republicans like Michelle Bachman are calling for Obama's Healthcare Act to be repealed [Reuters]

US President Barack Obama’s healthcare legislation, which requires almost all citizens to have medical insurance by 2014, is constitutional, a US appeals court has ruled.

The US Appeals Court for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld on Tuesday a lower court ruling that had found it constitutional to require people to buy healthcare insurance coverage by early 2014, or face a penalty.

Healthcare reform bill

Requires most citizens to have medical insurance

Bars denial of coverage due to a medical history

Prevents higher premiums due to health status or sex

Extends coverage to 15 million low income workers

"It certainly is an encroachment on individual liberty, but it is no more so than a command that restaurants or hotels are obliged to serve all customers regardless of race ... or that a farmer cannot grow enough wheat to support his own family," wrote Judge Laurence Silberman in the majority opinion, citing past federal mandates that inspired legal fights.

It is a victory for the Obama administration, which argued that it had introduced the law to lessen the burden of the soaring healthcare costs and to increase coverage for the more than 35 million citizens without health care insurance.

Judge Brett Kavanaug, of the Washington DC Circuit, said the federal court did not have jurisdiction to decide the case.

In his 65-page dissent he wrote that the Anti-Injunction Act, "limits the jurisdiction of federal courts over tax-related matters" and said the penalty charged for not having insurance is a tax.

Split views

The latest ruling may be the last to rule on the law before the US Supreme Court takes up a request by the Obama administration to review an August 12 ruling by the appeals court in Atlanta, which found the insurance mandate is unconstitutional.

More than half the states have sued to challenge the law, saying Congress overstepped its constitutional authority.

A three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court agreed, saying in August that the law is not protected by the Commerce
Clause of the US Constitution, which allows Congress to regulate commerce among states.

It, too, said the penalty for not having insurance was akin to a tax, which the US government was not entitled to levy.

A US appeals court in Cincinnati has said the individual mandate was constitutional.

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
City
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
Weaving and handicrafts are being re-taught to a younger generation of Iraqi Kurds, but not without challenges.
The author argues that in the new economy, it's people, not skills or majors, that have lost value.
Colleagues of detained Al Jazeera journalists press demands for their release, 100 days after their arrest in Egypt.
Mehdi Hasan discusses online freedoms and the potential of the web with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.
Featured
Libya has seen a blossoming of media outlets, but the media landscape is as polarised as the politics on the streets.
As nuclear age approaches eighth decade, visitors flock to historic bomb craters at New Mexico test sites.
Venezuela's president lacks the charisma and cult of personality maintained by the late Hugo Chavez.
Despite the Geneva deal, anti-government protesters in Ukraine's eastern regions don't intend to leave any time soon.
Since independence, Zimbabwe has faced food shortages, hyperinflation - and several political crises.
join our mailing list