US-Colombia pact 'unconstitutional'

Colombia's constitutional court says the accord should be submitted to Congress for approval.

    The agreement gave the US military access
    to at least seven Colombian bases [AFP]

    'No legislative oversight'

    The lawsuit claimed the October 2009 military accord was invalid because it was signed by the government of President Alvaro Uribe without prior discussion in Congress, as mandated by the constitution.

    The military pact, part of a joint effort to counter drug trafficking and insurgencies, has been denounced by neighbouring Venezuela as US interference in the region, raising tensions between Bogota and Caracas.

    Opponents also accuse Uribe of ignoring the advice of the State Council - the highest court on administrative matters - which also urged that the congress take up the agreement before it was signed.

    The Uribe administration deemed the State Council's opinion non-binding, and said the accord was not new but merely an extension of a 1974 military pact with the United States, and as such required no legislative oversight, government officials said.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed?

    Is an empowered Palestinian girl not worthy of Western feminist admiration?

    Inside the world of Chinese bitcoin mining

    Inside the world of Chinese bitcoin mining

    China is one of the main exchange markets and hosts some of the biggest bitcoin 'mining pools' in the world.

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.