Obama to seek $33bn more for war

US president expected to ask congress for extra funds for Afghanistan troop build-up.

    Obama has said the 30,000 troop increase is needed for a 'successful conclusion' in Afghanistan [AFP]

    Despite the proposed increase for next year, analysts say Pentagon procurement is likely to remain under pressure, and more weapons-buying programmes may be cut, because personnel and healthcare costs are taking up an increasing chunk of the overall Pentagon budget.

    Vital national interest

    Last week, Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he expected Pentagon funding to begin to drop within a couple years because of the country's economic woes.

    In depth


    Full text: Obama's West Point speech

    Videos:

     Deadline to defeat the Taliban
     Desertions undermine Afghan army
     Afghanistan: 'Graveyard of empires'
     The general's plan in Afghanistan

    Blogs:

     The West Point speech
     A defining moment in Obama's presidency?
     The home comforts of the US's war in Afghanistan

    High unemployment and a record $1.4 trillion deficit are among the toughest domestic challenges facing Obama and could dim the election prospects for his Democratic party in November congressional elections.

    Despite that, Obama and his defence secretary, Robert Gates, face a major challenge trimming even a limited number of weapons programmes over the objections of legislators who see them as a source of skilled manufacturing jobs.

    After more than two months consulting military leaders, ambassadors and national security advisers in a review of US strategy in Afghanistan, Obama announced last month that he would send an extra 30,000 troops to the war.

    The deployment, he said, was in the "vital national interest" of the US, and would create a situation allowing the US to start withdrawing its troops in mid-2011.

    He said the additional troops "are the resources that we need to seize the initiative" and bring the eight-year long war to a "successful conclusion".

    The increased deployment will increase the US military presence in Afghanistan to around 100,000.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera and agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    John Pilger Q&A: 'US missiles are pointed at China'

    Journalist John Pilger thinks the US and China might be on the path to war. "My film is a warning," he says.

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Sadly but frankly, Donald Trump is not going anywhere

    Trump isn't going to be impeached by this or perhaps any future Congress as currently constituted.