US court rejects Uighur freedom

US appeals court overturns ruling that freed 17 Uighur men held at Guantanamo Bay.

    The Uighurs are Turkic speaking Muslims from
    western China [GALLO/GETTY]

    The move presents a diplomatic quandary for Barack Obama, the US president, who plans to close the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within a year.

    It also comes as Eric Holder, the US attorney general, is to visit Guantanamo
    Bay next week to examine the US detention facility.

    Holder said he would go to the base "to really see what is going on down at the facility, to see how people are being detained, to talk to people down there about the interrogation techniques that are being used," Reuters news agency reported.

    Detention criticised

    Last October, US district judge Ricardo Urbina ordered the US government to free the 17 men into the Washington DC area, where there is a large Uighur community, many of whom have offered to serve as host families.

    Urbina also strongly criticised the administration of George Bush, the former US president, for holding the men - who were not classified as enemy combatants - for an indefinite period without charge.

    "I think the moment has arrived for the court to shine the light of constitutionality on the reasons for the detention," he said.

    "There is a pressing need to have these people, who have been incarcerated for seven years, to have those conditions changed."

    No 'legal basis'

    However on Wednesday the federal appeals court overturned this ruling and rejected the argument that the Uighurs deserved to be released into the United States "after all they have endured at the hands of the US."

    "Such sentiments, however high-minded, do not represent a legal basis for upsetting settled law and overriding the prerogatives of political branches," Raymond Randolph, a senior circuit court judge on the panel, wrote in the decision on Wednesday.

    The US has already released four Uighurs from Guantanamo Bay in 2006, sending them to Albania because it was the only country that would take them.

    On Wedneday, a Swedish immigration court granted asylum to one of the men as his sister lives in the country, the Associated Press news agency reported.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.