US House passes surveillance bill

Bill would shield telecoms firms involved in controversial surveillance programme.

    Bush approved the surveillance programme after the September 11 attacks [EPA]

    US telecommunications companies currently face about 40 lawsuits stemming from groups and individuals who think that the Bush administration illegally monitored their phone calls or emails under the programme.

    However Bush praised the bill as being a vital tool "to help our intelligence professionals learn enemies' plans for new attacks".

    'Mass surveillance'

    Civil liberties groups and some Democratic critics say that the secret programme was illegal because it goes against the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa), which requires a court order to spy on US citizens inside the US.

    "What we have here is the opportunity for the government to commit mass
    untargeted surveillance," Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democratic representative, said.

    Republicans and Democrats had argued bitterly over the bill, with Democrats facing pressure in an election year to pass the bill or face accusations of being weak on terrorism, but at the same time expressing anger at what was seen as a more objectionable Senate version of the bill.

    The compromise bill passed by the House requires a federal district court to review certifications from the attorney general, saying the telecommunications companies received presidential orders telling them wiretaps were needed to detect or prevent an attack.

    If the paperwork is deemed in order,the judge would dismiss the lawsuit.

    It would also require the inspectors general of the justice department, Pentagon and intelligence agencies to launch an investigation into the wiretapping programme, with a report due in a year.

    Companies such as AT&T, Verizon Communications and Sprint Nextel are among those accused in lawsuits of violating US citizens' privacy rights.

    However the White House had threatened to veto any surveillance bill that did not also shield the companies.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why Saudi-Israeli normalisation could be dangerous

    Why Saudi-Israeli normalisation could be dangerous

    Apart from being disastrous for Palestine, normalising relations with Israel could get Saudi Arabia in real trouble.

    Gender violence in India: 'Daughters are not a burden'

    Gender violence in India: 'Daughters are not a burden'

    With female foeticide still widespread, one woman tells her story of being mutilated for giving birth to her daughters.

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    There are reports Saudi Arabia is demanding money from the senior officials it recently arrested.