[QODLink]
Americas
US senators condemn oil profits
Oil executives defend record profits and high salaries at committee hearing.
Last Modified: 22 May 2008 12:58 GMT
Senator Leahy said the Bush administration was
responsible for the companies' record profits [EPA]

Members of US congress have expressed anger to oil executives over rising prices and large oil companies' soaring profits.
 
Executives from Exxon Mobil, Shell, and three other major energy firms were summoned to testify before the Congressional Judiciary Committee as prices hit a new record of $132 a barrel.
Executives defended their profits and high salaries to senators on the committee in Washington DC on Wednesday, with John Hofmeister, president of Shell oil, remarking that "as repetitive and uninteresting as it may sound, the fundamental laws of supply and demand are at work".
However, Democratic members of the committee said this explanation did not suffice and prices needed to be controlled.
 
"We need to get prices under control ... we can only conclude that the oil markets have failed," said Herbert Kohl, a senator for Wisconsin, said.
 
'No explanation'
 
Republican senators also condemned the companies' profits, with Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania noting that Exxon's annual profits increased in the past five years from $11.5bn to $40.6bn.
 
Your Views

Should the US House of Representatives sue Opec?

Send us your views

Specter said there was no explanation for "why profits have gone up so high when the consumer is suffering so much".
 
J Stephen Simon, executive vice-president of Exxon Mobil, said profits have been huge "in absolute terms'' but must be viewed in the context of the large scale of the industry.
 
He said high earnings are needed "in the current up cycle'' to pay for investments in the long term when profits will be down.
 
The companies, also including Chevron and BP, earned a combined total of $36bn in the first quarter of 2008.
 
Tax move
 
During the hearings some Democratic senators tied the companies' record profits to the Bush administration's support of the oil industry.
 
"The president once boasted that with his pals in the oil industry, he would be able to keep prices low," said Patrick Leahy, senator for Vermont and chairman of the judiciary committee.
 
"Instead, it is his pals in the oil industry who have benefited."
 
Earlier this month, Democratic congress members unveiled a new energy package that would revoke $17bn in tax breaks extended to big oil companies and impose a 25 per cent windfall profits tax on firms that do not invest in new energy sources.
 
However, oil executives criticised the proposals as "counterproductive".
 
"We urge you not to pass measures ... such as tax increases that diminish our investment capabilities, reduce the attractiveness of high-cost domestic production, or disadvantage US oil and gas companies," said John Lowe, executive vice-president of ConocoPhillips.
 
Oil companies also asked the committee for an expansion of their rights to explore US lands and offshore regions for oil, a move strongly condemned by environmental activists.
 
Oil prices have soared in recent years following rising demand in China and other emerging economies.
 
Last week, Saudi Arabia rejected a US appeal to increase oil production, saying they had already done so by an extra 300,000 barrels per day and were meeting existing demand.
Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
In the frozen peaks of Afghanistan's Kunar province, a ferocious clash for supremacy rages amid the mountaintops.
Indigenous community with "third world conditions" sits 90km from diamond mine, prompting fight for resource royalties.
There is a unique and dangerous commerce system at work in Amazonia, where children risk their lives for a few pennies.
Organisations that influence social, cultural and political issues in the US have been hijacked by the far right.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go