[QODLink]
Americas
US declassifies 'torture' memo
Document approving use of harsh interrogations outside the US is released.
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2008 19:06 GMT
The US was widely condemned for prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib in Iraq [AP]

The US justice department has released a declassified 2003 memo that approved the use of harsh interrogation methods on al-Qaeda and Taliban suspects held abroad.
 
The memo, which was subsequently overruled, said George Bush's authority as president superseded international bans on torture.
"Our previous opinions make clear that customary international law is not federal law and that the president is free to override it at his discretion," the memo, written by John Yoo, who was then deputy assistant attorney general for the US Office of Legal Counsel, said.
The document was released in response to a legal action launched by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) concerning the treatment of prisoners in US custody abroad.
 
Waterboarding
 
External link

Read the full memo here

The memo also offered a defence in case any interrogator was charged with breaking US or international laws.
 
"Finally, even if the criminal prohibitions outlined above applied, and an interrogation method might violate those prohibitions, necessity or self-defence could provide justifications for any criminal liability," the memo concluded.
 
The Pentagon, unlike US intelligence bodies, specifically prohibited its interrogators from using certain harsh methods, including a simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding.
 
The memo was rescinded in December 2003, nine months after Yoo sent it to the Pentagon's top lawyer, William J Haynes.
 
Democratic criticism
 
There have been widespread protests over
US prisoner abuse scandals [Reuters]
The US has faced widespread criticism over a series of prisoner abuse scandals at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in 2003 and the Guantanamo Bay detention centre.
 
"Senior officials at the justice department gave the Pentagon the green light to torture prisoners,"Amrit Singh, an ACLU lawyer, said.
 
Singh said the memo, and a similar 2002 opinion for the CIA, undermine the Bush administration's argument that abuses such as Abu Ghraib in 2003 were aberrations.
 
"These memos just go to show that it was the policies of the Bush administration that was driving this abuse," she said.
 
Democratic party politicians also condemned the memo and called for those who approved it to be held accountable.
 
"This memo created the lawless atmosphere that led directly to the abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib. Those who wrote it and those who approved it should be held accountable," Joseph Biden, a Democratic senator, said.
 
The memo by Yoo also included past legal defences of other interrogation methods that were not considered torture, such as sleep deprivation, hooding detainees and "frog crouching,'' which forces prisoners to crouch while standing on the tips of their toes.
 
The "definition of torture must be read as a sum of these component parts," the memo said.
 
"Our policy is to treat detainees humanely and that has always been the case," Commander JD Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman, said.
Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
Your chance to be an investigative journalist in Al Jazeera’s new interactive game.
An innovative rehabilitation programme offers Danish fighters in Syria an escape route and help without prosecution.
Street tension between radical Muslims and Holland's hard right rises, as Islamic State anxiety grows.
Take an immersive look at the challenges facing the war-torn country as US troops begin their withdrawal.
Featured
Private citizens take initiative to help 'irregular' migrants, accusing governments of excessive focus on security.
Indonesia's cassava plantations are being killed by mealybugs, and thousands of wasps will be released to stop them.
Violence in Ain al-Arab has prompted many Kurdish Syrians to flee to Turkey, but others are returning to battle ISIL.
Unelected representatives quietly iron out logistics of massive TPP and TTIP deals among US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
Led by students concerned for their future with 'nothing to lose', it remains to be seen who will blink first.