[QODLink]
Americas
CIA faces interrogation tapes order
Bush's administration told to explain why CIA interrogation tapes were destroyed.
Last Modified: 25 Jan 2008 06:29 GMT
The court decision is a setback to president Bush and his government [GALLO/GETTY]
A judge has ordered the administration of US president George Bush to explain why CIA videotapes showing the interrogation of al-Qaeda suspects were destroyed in 2005.
 
Judge Richard Roberts has given the government three weeks to give an explanation and has also asked the CIA whether it destroyed other evidence.
The move on Thursday by Roberts is a legal setback for Bush's government, which has previously urged courts not to get involved in the issue.
 
It also marks the first instance of a US judge ordering the administration to provide a written report in the dispute.

'Harsh tactics'

 

The tapes are believed to have shown harsh interrogation tactics used by CIA officers questioning Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, both al-Qaeda suspects, in 2002.

 

" It was only a matter of time before a court ordered the government to account for its handling - or mishandling - of evidence in these cases"

David Remes, lawyer
The US justice department and Congress are now investigating the tapes' destruction.

 

At the time of the tapes' destruction, the government was under court orders to retain evidence relevant to terror suspects at the US detention centre at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

 

After the destruction of the tapes became public in December, lawyers for several detainees went to court demanding to know more.

 

"There's enough there that it's worth asking ... [why the videos or other documents were destroyed]," Charles Carpenter, a lawyer said.

 

"I don't know the answer to that question, but the government does know the answer and now they have to tell judge Roberts."

 

Order 'violated'

 

A federal judge in New York said earlier this month that destroying the tapes appeared to have violated his order in a case involving the American Civil Liberties Union.

 

But US district judge Alvin Hellerstein has not yet said how he will rule.

 

Roberts issued a three-page ruling late on Thursday siding with Carpenter, who represents Guantanamo Bay detainee Hani Abdullah.

 

The judge said the lawyers had made a preliminary showing that information obtained from Abu Zubaydah was relevant to the detainee's lawsuit and should not have been destroyed.

 

Roberts said he wants a report by February 14 explaining what the government has done to preserve evidence since his July 2005 court order, what it is doing now and whether any other potentially relevant evidence has been destroyed.

 

Dean Boyd, US justice department spokesman, gave no comment.

 

David Remes, a lawyer in a similar case who unsuccessfully sought information about the videotapes, praised the ruling.

 

"It was only a matter of time before a court ordered the government to account for its handling - or mishandling - of evidence in these cases," Remes said. 

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
'Justice for All' demonstrations swell across the US over the deaths of African Americans in police encounters.
Six former Guantanamo detainees are now free in Uruguay with some hailing the decision to grant them asylum.
Disproportionately high number of Aboriginal people in prison highlights inequality and marginalisation, critics say.
Nearly half of Canadians have suffered inappropriate advances on the job - and the political arena is no exception.
Featured
Women's rights activists are demanding change after Hanna Lalango, 16, was gang-raped on a bus and left for dead.
Buried in Sweden's northern forest, Sorsele has welcomed many unaccompanied kids who help stabilise a town exodus.
A look at the changing face of North Korea, three years after the death of 'Dear Leader'.
While some fear a Muslim backlash after café killings, solidarity instead appears to be the order of the day.
Victims spared by the deadly disease are reporting blindness and other unexpected post-Ebola health issues.