Judge defers hearing on CIA tapes

The hearing marks first time US government has appeared in court over the affair.

    The CIA's admission has angered human rights
    activists [EPA] 


    At the hearing in Washington DC, Judge Kennedy appeared to agree in part with the US government, saying at one point: "Why should the court not permit the department of Justice to do just that?"

    The judge did not say when he would issue his ruling.

    The hearing marked the first time the US government had been in court over the tapes since the CIA admitted earlier this month it had destroyed them.

    'Waterboarding' controversy

    "We have a smoking gun, as it were, with respect to the government's destruction of potentially relevant evidence"

    David Remes, US Guantanamo 
    detainee lawyer

     

    David Remes, lawyer for the Guantanamo detainees, had asked the court to call an inquiry as the tapes - made in 2002 and not actually at Guantanamo - because they reportedly show two suspects undergoing waterboarding, a process of simulated drowning widely considered torture.

    Remes said the government was prohibited from destroying any evidence that could be relevant in a case, even if not directly noted in a court order.

    "We have a smoking gun, as it were, with respect to the government's destruction of potentially relevant evidence," he said at the hearing.

    However 

    Joseph Hunt, the US justice department's lawyer, said a court inquiry would be "unwise and imprudent" and could damage the joint Justice Department-CIA investigation's investigation.

    Hunt added that justice department officials would notify the court if they found evidence that Judge Kennedy's court order had been violated.

    Remes countered that such an inquiry would be like "foxes guarding the henhouse".

    In addition to the CIA-justice department investigation, both the US house and senate intelligence committees are holding inquiries into the scandal.

    The CIA's admission earlier this month that the tapes had been destroyed caused widespread anger amongst human rights groups and some Democrat members of Congress.

    The CIA denies torture and says the tapes were destroyed to protect the identity of the agents involved.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    This part of 'The Crusades: An Arab Perspective' explores the birth of the Muslim revival in the face of the Crusades.

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    A photojournalist describes how she posed as a prostitute to follow the trade in human flesh.

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    It's time to change the way we talk and think about Africa.