US attorney-general to resign

Alberto Gonzales's decision comes after prolonged standoff with critics in congress.

    Gonzales came under heavy fire in congress over the firing of several federal prosecutors [AFP]

    He also faced a possible perjury investigation for his testimony before congress.
     
    Viviana Hurtado, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Washington, said: "From the start, President Bush's decision to choose Alberto Gonzales as US attorney-general, the government's top law officer, was divisive.
     
    "Charged with shaping the legal limits of Bush's declared 'war on terror', Gonzales played a key role in several legal decisions that have shaped US security policy since September 2001."
     
    Replacement
     
    According to a senior administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity, Gonzales, 51, will be temporarily replaced by Paul Clement, the solicitor-general, who will take over until a permanent replacement is found.
     
    Gonzales is the latest member of Bush's inner circle to leave the White House as the administration heads towards the final year of its two-term reign.
     
    Karl Rove, a senior Bush adviser, departed last week, following Dan Bartlett, former communications director, earlier this year.
     
    Gonzales worked for Bush when he was governor of Texas in the 1990s.
     
    He served as White House lawyer in Bush's first term as president before becoming the first Hispanic attorney-general in February 2005.
     
    Trust friend
     
    Al Jazeera's Hurtado said: "Bush turned again to his old trusted friend and tapped him to run the department of justice. Gonzales's predecesor, John Ashcroft, had resigned after falling ill amid speculation that he had fallen out of favour with the White House for not re-authorising a secret surveillance programme.
     
    "Almost immediately he came under fire for expanding the administration's domestic surveillance programme and for helping to convince Bush to declare captured Taliban and al-Qaeda suspects 'enemy combatants' rather than 'prisoners of war'.
     
    "That decision denied those held at Guantanamo and other US-run prisons of legal protections under US and international laws.
     
    "Separately, he argued for a new definition of what constitutes torture. Critics say this opened the door for abuse of prisoners in US custody."
     
    Denial and defence
     
    While acknowledging mistakes in the handling of the dismissals, Gonzales had denied the firings were politically motivated to influence federal investigations involving Democratic or Republican legislators.
     
    Bush had defended Gonzales and cited his rise as an achievement for Hispanics, the largest minority in the US.
     
    "I haven't seen congress say he's done anything wrong," Bush said recently.
     
    "As a matter of fact, I believe we're watching ... a political exercise."

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    The many ways in which the assassination of the North Korean leader could lead to a total disaster.

    Lebanon has a racism problem

    Lebanon has a racism problem

    The problem of racism in Lebanon goes beyond xenophobic attitudes towards Syrian and Palestinian refugees.

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The man we call 'Salman Rushdie' today is not the brilliant author of the Satanic Verses, but a Picassoesque imposter.