Senate cripples US immigration bill

Senators vote against limiting debate on plans to legalise millions of immigrants.

    Senator Kennedy, left, was one of the
    main architects of the bill [AFP]

    But a crowded senate calendar complicates the bill's chances of being re-tabled in the future.
     
    In the House of Representatives, Democratic leaders do not intend to act on the issue until the senate has finished considering it.
     
    Tightening borders
     
    The legislation would tighten borders and institute a new system to prevent employers from hiring undocumented workers, in addition to giving up to 12 million illegal immigrants a pathway to legal status.
     

    "Doing nothing is not an alternative. This issue isn't going away"

    Edward M Kennedy, Democratic senator

    Many in the senate argued they needed more time to make the bill tougher with tighter border security measures and a more arduous legalisation process for unlawful immigrants.
     
    Even those who support the bill have argued that it would make second-class citizens of temporary workers and would prioritise employability over family ties in future immigration.
     
    "We can all find different aspects of this legislation that we differ with," said senator Edward M Kennedy, a Democratic and one of the architects of the bill.
     
    But he said he hoped the measure would survive the vote, saying: "Doing nothing is not an alternative. This issue isn't going away."
     
    Compromise
     
    Kennedy had partnered with senator Jon Kyl, a republican, and several others to create the bill, essentially a compromise that tired to balance tougher border security and limits to immigration with plans to legalise millions of people who are living and working in the US unlawfully.
     
    Kyl, however, broke from the bipartisan clique that hatched the agreement, siding with Republicans who said they hadn't gotten enough chances to toughen the bill.
     
    "It's time to scrap this mess of a bill," said Jim DeMint, a republican senator who had failed in several attempts to make the measure more punitive toward illegal immigrants.
     
    Senator Arlen Specter, a Republican and another proponent of the bill, said he believed "that we will yet succeed".
     
    Frank Sharry, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, called the vote "a huge disappointment to immigrant communities and those seeking a solution to the dysfunctional immigration system".
     
    He said: "We fear the result was a matter of politicians, particularly Republicans, not wanting to confront obstinate members of their own parties in order to let the majority's will, and the people's will, prevail."
     
    A survey, conducted between May 30 and June 3 by the Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press, found that about two-thirds of the American public were in favour of the bill's proposal to give illegal immigrants citizenship if they have jobs, pass background checks and pay fines.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    Assassinating Kim Jong-un could go so wrong

    The many ways in which the assassination of the North Korean leader could lead to a total disaster.

    Lebanon has a racism problem

    Lebanon has a racism problem

    The problem of racism in Lebanon goes beyond xenophobic attitudes towards Syrian and Palestinian refugees.

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The life and death of Salman Rushdie, gentleman author

    The man we call 'Salman Rushdie' today is not the brilliant author of the Satanic Verses, but a Picassoesque imposter.