[QODLink]
Americas
'War tsar' admits Iraq surge doubts
General Douglas Lute tells US senate that "early results are mixed".
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2007 01:56 GMT
Lute said early results of the so-called
surge were mixed [EPA]
The general picked by the US president to turn things around in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq has admitted that he had misgivings about the so-called surge in Iraq and that results so far have been "mixed".
At Lieutenant-General Douglas Lute's senate confirmation hearing for his position as the new White House "war tsar" on Thursday, he said he had been sceptical of George Bush's plan to add more than 21,000 combat soldiers to Iraq before it was announced in January.
"I expressed concerns in the policy development phase … that this not be simply a one-dimensional surge," the three-star army general told the hearing.
 
His comments came as the US military reached another bleak milestone in Iraq on Thursday, with American deaths crossing the 3,500 mark.
 
Attacks also claimed at least 15 Iraqi lives on Thursday and Muqtada al-Sadr, an influential Iraqi Shia leader, blamed Washington for many of Iraq's problems.
 
Al-Sadr also criticised the Iraq government for failing to provide essential services to the people and helping the displaced.
 
Jury still out
 
Lute said the surge would "likely have only temporary and localised effects" unless it was accompanied by parallel efforts by the Iraqi army and civilian US government departments.
 
"The Iraqi government has taken some steps to demonstrate that it must surge, if you like, alongside of us," Lute said, while describing Iraqi progress on security as "uneven so far".
 
But he said "the bidding is still out" on whether his scepticism had been justified by events so far.
 
"Early results are mixed. Conditions on the ground are deeply complex and are likely to continue to evolve, meaning that we will need to constantly adapt," he said.
 
The creation of the "war tsar" role more than four years after the invasion has many US senators questioning whether the position signals the Bush administration is running out of ideas on how to turn the conflict around.
 
Many have questioned how effective a three-star general would be at managing a war effort from the White House and getting co-operation from four-star generals and cabinet minister.
 
They also ask whether such a position is too little too late to turn around a war most Americans no longer support.
Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
More and more people in the US are living in poverty - yet Mitt Romney's policies would further shred the safety net.
The US has more wireless devices than people but without a large increase in bandwidth capacity, networks might crash.
Is Israel being deliberately indecisive on whether or not to support the Syrian opposition?
The contradictions of Obama's policy toward Iran went unnoticed in the US, but not in Iran and Israel, writes Porter.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go