[QODLink]
Americas
US climate exhibit 'toned down'
Smithsonian Institute accused of delaying exhibit on global warming.
Last Modified: 25 May 2007 06:11 GMT
Many scientists warn of the dangers
of global warming [AFP]
The Smithsonian museum institute toned down a global warming exhibit, fearing it would displease the US government, a former museum director has said.

Robert Sullivan, who resigned from the National Museum of Natural History six months ago, said the exhibit on climate change in the Arctic was changed "to make the science a little less certain." 
The Washington based institute also decided to postpone the opening of the global warming exhibit, Sullivan said.
 
"It was to soften the exhibition, tone it down a little and make the science a little less certain, make it a little more cautious," he said.

"There was a concern that this was a controversial topic."

The Smithsonian Institute, which runs 18 museums in the US capital, receives 70 per cent of its funds from the government - making it sensitive to official policies and guidelines.

The Smithsonian Institute issued a statement branding Sullivan's allegations erroneous, saying that he was neither a scientist or directly involved with museum exhibits.

  

"We would never alter an exhibition on global climate change that would contradict our own knowledge and research, and that of other leading scientists around the world," Cristian Samper, Smithsonian acting secretary said in the statement.

The exhibit at the National Museum of Natural History finally ran from April to November of 2006 and focused on climate change in the Arctic region as observed by scientists.

'Uncertainty'

 

While many scientists agree the ominous rise in global temperatures is caused by human activity, in particular greenhouse gas emissions,

 

The Bush administration has rejected the research, which raises the prospect of the costly decision of curbing emissions.

  

Sullivan said the Arctic exhibit was canceled just before it was due to open and the project was put on hold for six months as museum officials altered its content.

  

"We were looking for scientific uncertainty of the data that is to make it appear more uncertain.

 

"You would have a statement about a model predicting global warming over time and you would add a label saying this model could be interpreted differently," he said.

  

He admitted not taking part in the deliberations. "Nobody was specifically asking us to do it, the Congress was not asking, the White House was not asking," he said.

  

"It was insidious. It's never stated as a policy, but it's always kind of there, this kind of shadow. The knowledge is always there that you have to be careful, and that's recent, really in the last decade."

  

Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
More than one-quarter of Gaza's population has been displaced, causing a humanitarian crisis.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Muslim charities claim discrimination after major UK banks began closing their accounts.
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Featured
China President Xi Jinping's Mongolia visit brings accords in the areas of culture, energy, mining and infrastructure.
An estimated 36 people die each day in embattled town where pro-Russia rebel separatists fight Ukrainian soldiers.
People are starving in southern Somalia while relief efforts are blocked by government and rebel fighting.
Some scientists say authorities in favour of nuclear energy tend to deny the negative results of researchers.
Report on child sex abuse in British Asian community highlights issues that may affect the entire nation.
join our mailing list