[QODLink]
Americas
UK's Iraq move fuels Bush opponents
Bush's political opponents hail UK 'partial withdrawal' as rejection of US strategy.
Last Modified: 21 Feb 2007 21:14 GMT
Proponents of Bush's Iraq strategy say that the UK pullout is marginal [AFP]
An announcement by Tony Blair, the British prime minister, that the UK is to reduce its troops in Iraq has been hailed as a rejection of US military strategy by political opponents of George Bush.
 
Blair earlier told the British parliament on Wednesday that the current number of 7,100 UK troops in Iraq would be cut by 1,600 in the coming months.
Harry Reid, Senate Democratic majority leader, said the British government had "acknowledged a reality" that the US president "still stubbornly refuses to accept" as he seeks to send thousands more US troops into Iraq.
 
"There can be no purely military solution in Iraq," he said.

Related story

Blair announces Iraq troop pullout

Reid said:
"At a time when President Bush is asking our troops to shoulder a larger and unsustainable burden policing a civil war, his failed policies have left us increasingly isolated in Iraq and less secure here at home."

 

'Stunning rejection'

 

Edward Kennedy, a veteran Democratic senator, branded the British announcement a "stunning rejection" of Bush's strategy.

 

He said: "Now our country's strongest ally has rejected it.

 

"No matter how the White House tries to spin it, the British government has decided to split with president Bush and begin to move troops out of Iraq."

 

Your Views

"Has any of the Bush Iraq plans worked other than causing the worst destruction?"

Zaffar Zohair, Islamabad, Pakistan

Send us your views

Joseph Biden, the Senate foreign relations committee chairman and Democratic presidential candidate, said that Bush should follow Blair's example and "start to draw down our troops from Iraq, not send more into the middle of a civil war".

 

The US is currently undergoing a national debate on America's war in Iraq - driven by the new Democratic-controlled Congress - that is also increasingly defining the scope of the 2008 US presidential elections.

 

The House of Representatives last week managed to pass a non-binding resolution opposing Bush's surge of 21,500 extra troops into the country.

 

Iraq 'improving'

 

Bush administration representatives led by Dick Cheney, the US vice-president portrayed the move by Britain as a sign of that conditions were improving in Iraq.

 

"Now our country's strongest ally has rejected it"

Edward Kennedy, Democratic senator

Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, rejected suggestions the British announcement amounted to a timeline to withdraw forces from the country.


He said: "What you had is progress first and then the removal. This was not in response to any calendar that had been set by the parliament or by the prime minister."

 

Earlier, Cheney said the British move was a direct result of progress made in the British area of operations around the southern Iraqi city of Basra. 

 

"Well, I look at it and see it is actually an affirmation that there are parts of Iraq where things are going pretty well," Cheney said.

 

Condoleezza Rice, US secretary of state, said from Berlin: "The coalition remains intact and in fact the British still have thousands of soldiers deployed in Iraq."

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
More and more people in the US are living in poverty - yet Mitt Romney's policies would further shred the safety net.
As the anniversary of the uprising nears, the country's rulers are denying foreigners entry and hiring PR firms.
Under Obama, six whistleblowers have been charged under the World War I-era Espionage Act.
Journalist who recently spent time with fighters says there is no central leadership to the armed resistance.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go