[QODLink]
Americas
US House backs stem cell research
Democrat-led US House votes against restrictions on embryonic research funding.
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2007 18:56 GMT
Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the Democratic-led house of representatives [AP]

The Democratic-led US House of Representatives has voted to lift President George Bush's restrictions on federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research.

 

However, the vote of 253-174, largely along party lines, has fallen short of the two-thirds majority needed to overrule a presidential veto.

The measure was passed after an emotional debate in which supporters touted the research as the best hope for potential cures for ailments such as Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, Parkinson's disease and spinal cord injuries.

Opponents have condemned it as unethical and immoral. Bush restricted funding for the research in August 2001.

 

Bush, whose support base includes conservative Christian voters who tend to oppose the use of stem cells taken from human embryos, used the only veto of his presidency to date to reject a bill stem cell research in July.

 

The White House reiterated Bush's intention to use his veto power, by stating that American taxpayers should not have to pay for research involving the "intentional destruction of human embryos."

 

'First 100 legislative hours'

 

The bill is part of a six-measure package that Democrats vowed to vote on during their "first 100 legislative hours" after winning control of congress from Bush's Republicans in November elections.

 

"This legislation does not seek to destroy life"

Steny Hoyer, House democratic leader

Already this week, the House passed two other bills in the Democrats' legislative package, one to bolster US security and the other to raise the federal minimum wage.

 

The stem cell bill now goes to the senate, where supporters believe it will pass with a two-thirds majority needed to override the veto.

 

The stem-cell debate often transcends party politics, with some anti-abortion Republicans strongly supporting the research. Thirty-seven Republicans backed the bill on Thursday, while 16 Democrats opposed it.

 

Sanctity of life

 

Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the house democratic leader, said: "I believe this legislation does not seek to destroy life."

 

"It seeks to preserve and protect life."

 

"We have a moral obligation to provide our scientific community with the tools it needs to save lives."

 

Many scientists view embryonic stem cells as the potential raw material for a new era of regenerative medicine, hoping to harness the unique qualities of the cells to repair damaged tissue.

 

Stem cells can be thought of as a 'master cell' for the body, capable of growing into various tissue and cell types. Those taken from days-old embryos are especially malleable but "adult" stem cells found in babies and adults have also shown promise.

 

Christopher Smith, a New Jersey Republican, favours research on stem cells not taken from embryos but opposes the current measure.

 

"Where will this all take us? If this bill were to be passed and signed into law, we would see the demise, the destruction, over time ... of millions of embryos."

 

The new bill would allow federal funding on research involving stem cell lines derived from embryos created at fertility clinics that would otherwise be thrown away because they are not needed to implant in a woman to make a baby.

 

Last year, the House passed the bill 235-193 before Bush's veto.

Source:
Agencies.
Topics in this article
People
Featured on Al Jazeera
An unflinching portrait of physical labour in the 21st century.
The stark choice between a fascist or an imperialist course in Syria should be discarded for a third and better course.
Israel's propaganda machine carefully chooses its words to assert illegal ownership over Jerusalem and Palestine.
As Western fears grow over Iran's continuing nuclear programme, we ask how a military strike could impact the region.
<  > 
join our mailing list

Enter Zip Code
Go