[QODLink]
Africa

AU says Kenya leader should not go to trial

If the UN does not agree to defer trial, President Uhuru Kenyatta should not appear at the Hague, African Union says.

Last Modified: 13 Oct 2013 00:59
Email Article
Print Article
Share article
Send Feedback

African leaders have said the November trial of Kenya's president at the International Criminal Court should be delayed, and that if it was not, he should not attend.

An African Union summit on Saturday called on the UN Security Council to defer the trial under article 16 of the court's Rome Statute, which allows for a delay of a year subject to renewal.

"If that is not met, what the summit decided is that President (Uhuru) Kenyatta should not appear until the request we have made is actually answered," Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom told journalists in Addis Ababa.

We have agreed that no charges shall be commenced or continued before any international court or tribunal against any serving head of state or government, or anybody acting or entitled to act in such capacity during his or her term of office.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn

The summit was called to discuss Africa's relations with the court, which has provoked mounting frustration among Africans who accuse it of unfairly targeting people on the continent and largely ignoring crimes elsewhere in the world.

Kenyatta and his deputy, William Ruto, have been accused of orchestrating a killing spree after a disputed 2007 election, charges they deny. Kenyatta's trial starts on November 12, while Ruto's began last month.

Al Jazeera's Malcolm Webb, reporting from Addis Ababa, said it was a damning statement against the ICC from the AU and that, while it did not have any legal significance, it was a strong political statement.

"Its political meaning will be evident on Monday when President Kenyatta’s deputy William Ruto is due back in the Hague," Webb said. "If he doesn’t turn up then that will be a significant step and a stand against the court."

'Culture of impunity'

The African Union stance challenges the Hague-based court in its most high-profile case to date - its first trial of a sitting president.

Until now, both Kenyan leaders have said they would cooperate to clear their names and both have attended hearings.

"We would like our concerns to be heard loud and clear," Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn, whose country chairs the African Union, told the closing session.

"We have agreed that no charges shall be commenced or continued before any international court or tribunal against any serving head of state or government, or anybody acting or entitled to act in such capacity during his or her term of office."

Ministers did not call for a mass walk-out from the court's jurisdiction, after officials previously said such a proposal would be on the summit agenda. The idea did not win broad support among Africa's 34 signatories to the court's statutes.

Rights groups had urged African nations not to turn their backs on the court, which they say is vital to ending what they see as a culture of impunity in African politics.

497

Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies
Email Article
Print Article
Share article
Send Feedback
Topics in this article
People
Country
City
Organisation
Featured on Al Jazeera
More than one-quarter of Gaza's population has been displaced, causing a humanitarian crisis.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Muslim charities claim discrimination after major UK banks began closing their accounts.
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Featured
Frustration grows in Kiev as pledges to end corruption and abuse of power stagnate after Maidan Square protest.
Thousands of Houthi supporters have called for the fall of Yemen's government. But what do the Houthis really want?
New ration reductions and movement restrictions have refugees from Myanmar anxious about their future in Thailand.
US lawyers say poor translations of election materials disenfranchise Native voters.
US drones in Pakistan have killed thousands since 2004. How have leaders defended or decried these deadly planes?
join our mailing list