Rival Sudans agree to pull out from Abyei

The latest accord has been reached during talks in Addis Ababa,UN officials say.

    The governments of Sudan and newly independent South Sudan have agreed to withdraw their troops from the flashpoint border region of Abyei where UN forces are now in place, UN officials said.

    The Sudanese and South Sudanese governments reached the latest accord during talks in Addis Ababa, Edmond Mulet, UN assistant secretary general for peacekeeping, told reporters after a Security Council meeting on Sudan on Thursday.

    The accord was brokered by an African Union mediation panel led by former South African President Thabo Mbeki, Mulet said.

    "They have agreed that between September 11 and 30 there is going to be a redeployment or withdrawal of the troops" from Abyei by both sides, he said.

    Sudan had previously agreed to withdraw its troops when UN peacekeepers arrived. The UN force of more than 1,700 Ethiopian troops have been in Abyei for several weeks but Khartoum had kept their forces there. Some South Sudan troops have also remained in the territory.

    Mulet said the Khartoum government had insisted there had to be an administration in Abyei before it left, but has now agreed to withdraw.

    The fate of Abyei was left undecided when north and south Sudan split in July. Both sides claim the region, which did not hold a referendum on its future in January when South Sudan voted to break away.

    UN concerns

    Despite the accord, , Security Council members raised new concerns about Sudan where conflict in South Kordofan and Blue Nile states and deadlock in the Darfur war have added to fears of a growing crisis.

    Britain's UN ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said that the Abyei accord was encouraging but added: "Nonetheless we are deeply concerned about a number of issues over South Sudan and Sudan."

    He said the Khartoum government was still putting up "obstacles" to the UN mission in Abyei. "There is a very serious humanitarian situation in South Kordofan and Blue Nile to which humanitarian access is severely restricted if not entirely denied."

    Darfur "is still very bad" and the two Sudans have still not settled their border and the sharing of oil revenues, said the envoy.

    Lyall Grant and Germany's ambassador Peter Wittig said the UN Security Council would have to pay greater attention to Sudan in coming weeks.

    Both said the 15-nation council should avoid separate talks on the individual conflicts in Sudan and increase general pressure on the Sudan government and South Sudan to reduce tensions.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Why some African Americans are moving to Africa

    Escaping systemic racism: Why I quit New York for Accra

    African-Americans are returning to the lands of their ancestors as life becomes precarious and dangerous in the USA.

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    North Korea's nuclear weapons: Here is what we know

    North Korea's nuclear weapons