Indian top court rejects gay sex review

Judges turn down bunch of petitions that had sought a review of the December 11 verdict criminalising gay sex.

    Indian top court rejects gay sex review
    The December verdict criminalising gay sex had triggerd protests across India [AFP]

    India’s Supreme Court has refused to reconsider its recent verdict criminalising gay sex, that had triggered widespread outrage among gay rights activists.

    The top court’s rejection, seen as a setback to gay rights groups, was delivered on Tuesday in response to a plea by India’s federal government and the non-profit Naz Foundation along with other activists for reviewing its December 11 verdict.

    A bench of the court, comprising Justices H L Dattu and S J Mukhopadhaya, dismissed the bunch of petitions that attempted to challenge the December 2013 ruling which had declared gay sex an offence punishable up to life imprisonment.

    The verdict had asked the Indian parliament to amend the requisite laws to decriminalise gay sex, if it thought fit.

    The review petitions argued that thousands from the LGBT (lesbian gay bisexual transgender) community had become open about their sexual identity since 2009 after the Delhi high court decriminalised gay sex. They are now facing the threat of being prosecuted, reports, quoting the petitions, said.

    The petitioners also submitted that criminalising gay sex amounted to violation of fundamental rights of the LGBT community.

    The NGO had submitted that there were a number of “grave errors of law” and “wrong application of law” in the judgement which needed to be corrected, agencies quoting the petitions said.

    “This court has failed to consider the submission that Section 377 violates the right to health of men who have sex with men, since criminalisation of same sex activity impedes access to health services, including HIV prevention efforts,” the petitions reportedly contended.

    The federal ministry of health and family welfare had backed the review petitions,  the activists said.

    'Miscarriage of justice'

    The government had taken the stand that the apex court should review the December verdict to “avoid grave miscarriage of justice to thousands of LGBT” persons who have been aggrieved by the apex court judgement contending it is “unsustainable” as it “suffers from errors”, reports said.

    The Naz Foundation said that the verdict was contrary to the well-settled legal principles of the Constitution. Proscribing certain sexual acts between consenting adults in private, demeans and impairs the dignity of all individuals under Article 21, irrespective of their sexual orientation, reports said, quoting the Foundation’s plea.

    SOURCE: Al Jazeera


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.