Native seeds in danger of being monopolised

Chile recently ratified a treaty that could threaten biodiversity and endanger the rights of small farmers, critics say.

    Chilean president Sebastián Piñera successfully pushed for ratification of a treaty that grants patent rights to companies that discover or modify plant varieties [GALLO/GETTY]

    Fear is growing among environmental and indigenous organisations in Chile over the possible appropriation of native seeds by foreign companies, opening the doors to transgenic crops and their negative impact on biodiversity.

    Alarm arose because of several bills sponsored by the government of right-wing president Sebastián Piñera, especially after May 17 when Congress ratified the UPOV 91 Convention, which grants patent rights over new plant varieties to those who have discovered, developed or modified these varieties.

    The convention of the intergovernmental International Union for the Protection of New Plant Varieties (UPOV) is a revised version of a 1978 pact that Chile had already signed. Ratification of UPOV 91 was a requirement of the free trade treaties Santiago has entered into with Australia, the United States and Japan.

    Congress began debating a bill to adopt UPOV 91 in 2009, but little progress was made until Piñera intervened and declared it an urgent measure in March this year, to accelerate its passage.

    Social and environmental organisations warn that it may lead to dispossession of small farmers, loss of biodiversity and the introduction of transgenic crops.

    Genetic heritage 'threatened'

    "We asked for it not to be brought to a vote, but the government piled on the pressure, and the right generally supported it, because big companies want the Convention now, they want to start protecting their investments as soon as possible," Lucía Sepúlveda, representing the Alliance for a Better Quality of Life/Pesticide Action Network of Chile (RAP-AL Chile), said.

    "Our genetic heritage is threatened," said Francisca Rodríguez, head of the National Association of Rural and Indigenous Women (ANAMURI). "Our seeds are once again in danger. Only a small amount of them will remain, not even enough for reproduction; they will be left behind like museum pieces, testifying to yesterday's reality."

    On the contrary, the UPOV 91 convention is nothing but beneficial in the view of ChileBio, a biotechnology industry association made up of Monsanto, Bayer, Dow AgroSciences, Syngenta and Pioneer, companies that research, produce, develop and sell genetically modified crops.

    "An already existing system is being perfected. No new system or farming method is being introduced in the country," Miguel Ángel Sánchez, head of ChileBio, said.

    "In the senators' view, the Convention reduces farmers' rights, violates property rights and endangers the traditional knowledge held by communities."

    He added that no change would be made in the "system of protection of plant breeders, nor in farmers' costs, nor in the opportunity to appropriate traditionally used seeds".

    However, concerned by the possible effects of adopting the UPOV 91 convention and the absence of consultation with indigenous peoples, a group of 17 senators brought a lawsuit for its annulment to the Constitutional Court.

    In the senators' view, the Convention reduces farmers' rights, violates property rights and endangers the traditional knowledge held by communities.

    According to the Convention, a plant that is not regularly traded in the market or does not appear in an official register may be considered novel or distinct. Therefore, a company could appropriate the knowledge and biodiversity that are the heritage of small farmer and indigenous communities, without the need for legal expropriation or any compensation whatsoever.

    Court battles

    On June 24 the Constitutional Court dismissed the annulment petition. Nevertheless, the ruling said it was up to the government, congress, municipal governments and other autonomous state bodies to establish appropriate mechanisms for carrying out proper consultations to determine whether or not an administrative or legislative measure directly affects indigenous people, and to protect native communities "from possible abuse".

    Given this scenario, the main concern is that Chile lacks "a regulatory framework to prevent these laws from allowing the plunder of our resources, because only the big companies are protected", said Sepúlveda, the author of the book Chile: La semilla campesina en peligro (Chile: Peasant Seeds in Danger).

    Manuel Torok, an agronomist with the government's agricultural and livestock service, told a university forum that "anyone who wants to produce, offer for sale, import or export reproductive material will have to have permission from the rights holder".

    According to Torok, only 20 per cent of the fruit-producing trees sold in Chile are protected varieties, but if the trend seen in industrialised countries is followed, in 10 years time the proportion will be inverted: 80 per cent of the varieties will be protected, that is, the breeders will have exclusive rights, and only 20 per cent of seeds will be freely available.

    Environmentalists and indigenous peoples are also afraid that UPOV 91 will open the door to transgenic crops. At present, genetically modified seeds are produced in Chile for export, but their use on national soil is not permitted.

    "Chile is the top producer country of transgenic seeds in the southern hemisphere, but they cannot be used here. The paradox is that we import produce grown from those seeds," which means Chilean farmers are at a disadvantage compared to foreign producers, according to ChileBio, which belongs to the international CropLife network.

    But entering the global transgenics production chain and devoting certain regions of Chile to growing genetically modified crops is "to risk enormous and irreversible contamination", said Sepúlveda.

    A version of this article first appeared on Inter Press Service news agency.




    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    Why Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel

    No country in the world recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

    Strong quotes for Martin Luther King Jr Day

    Quotes from Martin Luther King Jr that resonate today

    Quotes of justice, education, religion and race said by MLK Jr.

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    It's time to change the way we talk and think about Africa.