US expected to sue Standard & Poor's

Lawsuit would mark first major enforcement action against agencies which gave high marks to risky mortgage debt.
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2013 01:39
Agencies like S&P gave high marks to mortgage debt that later collapsed once the housing bubble burst [Reuters]

The US government is expected to file civil charges against Standard & Poor's over the agency's assessments of the mortgage debt that helped to fuel the 2008 financial crisis.

The charges would mark the first enforcement action the government has taken against a major rating agency.

S&P said Monday that the Justice Department had informed the rating agency that it intends to file a civil lawsuit focusing on S&P's ratings of mortgage debt in 2007.

The action would not involve any criminal allegations, though; critics have long complained about the government's failure to bring criminal charges against any major Wall Street firms involved in the financial crisis. But criminal charges would require a higher burden of proof.

If S&P is eventually found to have committed civil violations, it could face fines and limits on how it does business.

S&P denies any wrongdoing and says any lawsuit would be without merit. The company said in a statement that a federal lawsuit would "disregard" the fact that S&P reviewed the same data on risky mortgages as US government officials, who said publicly in 2007 that the problems in the subprime mortgage market appeared to be limited.

S&P said it "deeply regrets" that some of its ratings "failed to fully anticipate the rapidly deteriorating conditions in the US mortgage market during that tumultuous time."

Nanda Chitre, a spokeswoman for the US justice department, declined to comment on the matter.

A free speech issue?

According to a report in the New York Times, the lawsuit will likely be brought this week after settlement talks between the department and S&P broke down last week.

The talks collapsed over federal authorities' insistence that a settlement involve at least $1bn, the Times reported.

Judges have previously thrown out claims brought by investors against the rating agencies, on the grounds that their ratings amount to free speech protected by the first amendment of the US constitution.

But the ratings in the expected S&P suit were not published widely, as most bond ratings are. As a result, several courts have ruled that those ratings do not enjoy free-speech protection.

S&P, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings are the three major ratings agencies, and they have been blamed for helping fuel the financial crisis by assigning AAA ratings to trillions of dollars in risky securities backed by subprime mortgages.

The securities collapsed once the housing bubble burst and home-loan delinquencies soared. Major US banks absorbed tens of billions in losses.

The rating agencies are important arbiters of the creditworthiness of securities traded around the world. The grades they assign can affect a company's ability to raise or borrow money and how much investors will pay for securities it issues.

Critics have long argued that rating agencies have an inherent conflict of interest, because they are paid by the same companies whose products and credit they rate.


Associated Press
Topics in this article
Featured on Al Jazeera
At least 25 tax collectors have been killed since 2012 in Mogadishu, a city awash in weapons and abject poverty.
Tokyo government claims its homeless population has hit a record low, but analysts - and the homeless - beg to differ.
3D printers can cheaply construct homes and could soon be deployed to help victims of catastrophe rebuild their lives.
Lack of child protection laws means abandoned and orphaned kids rely heavily on the care of strangers.
Booming global trade in 50-million-year-old amber stones is lucrative, controversial, and extremely dangerous.
Legendary Native-American High Bird was trained in ancient warrior traditions, which he employed in World War II.
Hounded opposition figure says he's hoping for the best at sodomy appeal but prepared to return to prison.
Fears of rising Islamophobia and racial profiling after two soldiers killed in separate incidents.
Group's culture of summary justice is back in Northern Ireland's spotlight after new sexual assault accusations.