What asylum seekers are really seeking

There is only so much of politicians that a person can take. After watching, first, Australia’s lower house of parliament, and then its Senate, debate new laws aimed at deterring asylum seekers from travelling to their shores by boat, I had seen enough. The politicians were full of c

by

    There is only so much of politicians that a person can take.

    After watching, first, Australia’s lower house of parliament, and then its Senate, debate new laws aimed at deterring asylum seekers from travelling to their shores by boat, I had seen enough.

    The politicians were full of contradictions and hypocrisy, and the debate ultimately went nowhere. The vote on the new laws failed to pass.

    So, with another TV report to do, I decided to keep it raw.

    No politicians, no commentators, just refugees themselves.

    What did people who’d come to Australia by boat themselves think of the debate?

    We sat, cross legged, in a western Sydney park and had our own debate.

    Their views surprised me: they were as full as contradictions as the politicians!

    I had a preconceived idea that they’d see “people smugglers” in a more benign way than the politicians who labelled them “evil”. After all, it was smugglers that had delivered them, safely, to Australia.

    Instead, the truth was far from it.

    All the refugees had feared for their lives on their journey. All had felt exploited.

    Three of four refugees I spoke to in the park said they would tell others standing on the Indonesian shore not to get on a similar boat.

    Yet they were also sure that their own boat passage had saved their lives.

    People smugglers’ motives may not have been pure, but they felt they owed them a debt of gratitude.

    As for stopping the boats, they said that would not save lives it would just lead them to being lost to oppressors rather than the ocean.

    There was disagreement. One of the four – the only one, interestingly, who had not had to travel by boat to Australia himself – did think it was worth asylum seekers risking the sea voyage to Australia.

    But even though the other three refugees had survived their trips – and all had good new lives in Australia – they were adamant that others should not follow their path.

    Even if that path meant oppression or death!

    As I said, contradictions are not the sole preserve of politicians.


    ABOUT THE AUTHOR



    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    This part of 'The Crusades: An Arab Perspective' explores the birth of the Muslim revival in the face of the Crusades.

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    A photojournalist describes how she posed as a prostitute to follow the trade in human flesh.

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    It's time to change the way we talk and think about Africa.