[QODLink]
Archive
US warns Iran against nuclear activity
The US has warned Iran of meaningful consequences if it continues to pursue its nuclear programme and Russia appears to have closed ranks behind the US on the issue.
Last Modified: 08 Mar 2006 06:56 GMT
Dick Cheney addresses a pro-Israeli lobbying group
The US has warned Iran of meaningful consequences if it continues to pursue its nuclear programme and Russia appears to have closed ranks behind the US on the issue.

Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, said in a speech on Tuesday to a pro-Israel lobbying group that Iran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and said the issue may soon go before the Security Council.

"The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose meaningful consequences," Cheney told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

"We join other nations in sending that regime a clear message: We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon."

He said the US "is keeping all options on the table in addressing the irresponsible conduct of the regime".

In the past the US had said it had no intention of using military force for the time being, but had declined to rule it out.

Also on Tuesday, Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, said: "The United States has been very clear: The enrichment and reprocessing on Iranian soil is not acceptable."
 
But Rice shied away from warning of immediate UN sanctions after meeting Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister.

"We will see what is necessary to do in the Security Council," she said, adding that there was still time for Iran to change its ways.

No compromise

At a joint news conference with Rice, Lavrov said there was no compromise in sight with Iran.

His statement signalled that Russia was backing away from what EU diplomats said was a proposal to let Iran do some atomic research if it agreed to refrain from enriching uranium on an industrial scale for seven to nine years.

Condoleezza Rice and Sergei
Lavrov (L) in Washington, DC

Russia apparently abandoned the informal proposal after Western objection, but Lavrov denied that he had made any new proposal.

"There is no compromise new proposal," Lavrov said.  

Rice added: "The Russians did not tell us of any new proposal."

But EU diplomats said Russian officials informally raised the idea of a seven- to nine-year moratorium during consultations over the past week.

US, British, French and German objection came swiftly when word of the offer leaked on Tuesday.

Russia has been negotiating with Iran and has proposed enriching fuel on Russian soil for Iran's energy need.

The United States and the European Union want Iran to shelve all work to enrich uranium because of suspicions that Tehran is secretly trying to make nuclear weapons.

Rice and Lavrov later met George Bush, the US president, at the White House for about half an hour.

Asked afterwards if Russia would accept sanctions against Iran, which Moscow has seemed reluctant to do, Lavrov said: "Have you seen a proposal for any sanctions? This is a hypothetical question, yes?"

Source:
Agencies
Topics in this article
People
Country
Featured on Al Jazeera
More than one-quarter of Gaza's population has been displaced, causing a humanitarian crisis.
Ministers and MPs caught on camera sleeping through important speeches have sparked criticism that they are not working.
Muslim charities claim discrimination after major UK banks began closing their accounts.
Italy struggles to deal with growing flood of migrants willing to risk their lives to reach the nearest European shores.
Featured
Frustration grows in Kiev as pledges to end corruption and abuse of power stagnate after Maidan Square protest.
Thousands of Houthi supporters have called for the fall of Yemen's government. But what do the Houthis really want?
New ration reductions and movement restrictions have refugees from Myanmar anxious about their future in Thailand.
US lawyers say poor translations of election materials disenfranchise Native voters.
US drones in Pakistan have killed thousands since 2004. How have leaders defended or decried these deadly planes?
join our mailing list