Sudan rejects call for UN troops

Sudan has given the cold shoulder to a UN proposal to take over from embattled African Union peacekeepers in the war-torn region of Darfur and urged the world to prop up the African body with more funds.

    Foreign Minister Lam Akol: Talk of handover 'premature'

    But the main rebel groups in Darfur welcomed the idea and agreed with UN envoy Jan Pronk's assessment that a more robust peacekeeping deployment with a stronger mandate was needed to quell the three-year-old bloodshed. 

    Lam Akol, the Sudanese foreign minister, described as "premature" any talk of a handover and reiterated his government's confidence in the almost 7000-strong AU contingent deployed in Darfur in western Sudan.

    "The AU has shown competence and its performance in Darfur has been good," he said in Khartoum. 

    "Such a proposal questions the AU's ability to carry out its
    mission, and the Africans' ability to solve their problems... It is regrettable that some African countries support this new trend," a Foreign Ministry statement said.

    Out of cash

    The mandate of the AU peacekeeping force is due to be extended at the end of the month for nine to 12 months but Akol said the mission is expected to run out of cash by March.

    He said the AU needed $160 million to carry out its mission until the end of 2006 and urged the international community
    to come forward with the funds. 

    Pronk, UN special envoy in Sudan, told the Security Council on Friday that the AU contingent in Darfur lacked the means to prevent conflict and proposed a more robust UN force to take its place. 

    AU urges compliance

    A senior AU official called on Khartoum to accept UN troops on Saturday.

    Patrick Mazimhaka, the deputy head of the executive AU Commission, said that as a member of AU's Peace and Security Council (PSC), Sudan was obliged to abide by the decisions of the 53-member pan-African body. 

    "Sudan will have to accept that decision [when it its made]. They are part of the PSC, they will have to comply with it."

    On Thursday, the AU said it may be forced to hand over its
    peacekeeping mission to the UN if international donors
    fail to plug a funding shortfall. 

    Rebels on board

    The two main rebel groups welcomed the UN proposal. 

    Rebels groups have welcomed
    the UN proposal

    Ahmed Hussein, spokesman for the Justice and Equality Movement, said: "We welcome any practical response by the international community, especially the United Nations, to address the situation in Darfur."

    Speaking from Abuja where his group has been jointly negotiating with the rival Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM), Hussein said the key to any peacekeeping deployment was the nature of its mandate. 

    "We don't just want troops, we want a force with a strong and clear mandate, a force that can protect civilians from the Janjawid and the government forces and actually implement US Security Council resolutions."

    SLM spokesman Mahjub Hussein said "so long as African troops are tasked with maintaining peace and security in Darfur, the
    Sudanese government will feel it can do whatever it wants".

    Pronk said the proposed UN force, which has yet to be approved by the Security Council, should stay at least three to four years after the signing of a peace agreement and should have its financing guaranteed. 

    SOURCE: AFP


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    Double standards: 'Why aren't we all with Somalia?'

    More than 300 people died in Somalia but some are asking why there was less news coverage and sympathy on social media.

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    How Moscow lost Riyadh in 1938

    Russian-Saudi relations could be very different today, if Stalin hadn't killed the Soviet ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Kobe Steel: A scandal made in Japan

    Japan's third-largest steelmaker has admitted it faked data on parts used in cars, planes and trains.