Bush: Iraq war intelligence wrong

George Bush, the US president, has accepted responsibility for going to war with faulty intelligence but defended a decision that has divided the country.

    George Bush defended his decision to go to war in Iraq

    "We cannot and will not leave Iraq until victory is achieved," he said.

    The president said that Thursday's parliamentary elections in Iraq would be a watershed moment that would inspire democracy across the Middle East.

    But with public opinion still running against his mission, Bush still was left defending his decision to go to war nearly three years ago.

    "It is true that much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong. As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq," Bush told a foreign policy forum on the eve of elections to establish Iraq's first permanent, democratically elected government.

    "And I'm also responsible for fixing what went wrong by reforming our intelligence capabilities. And we're doing just that.
    "We are in Iraq today because our goal has always been more than the removal of brutal dictator," Bush said.

    "It is to leave a free and democratic Iraq in his place.

    Americans less optimistic

    Bush insists his decision to
    remove Saddam was the right one

    "My decision to remove Saddam Hussein was the right decision. Saddam was a threat and the American people and the world is better off because he is no longer in power," the president told the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars.

    Most Americans see progress on establishing democracy in Iraq, but they are less optimistic about efforts to prevent a civil war and reduce the number of civilian casualties, polling found.

    Fifty-six percent said they thought progress was being made in the establishment of democracy, but almost as many - 53% - said they thought the United States was losing ground in reducing civilian casualties, according to the poll by the Pew Research Centre for the People & the Press.

    Banking on election

    As he usually does, Bush asserted that the Iraq of the future, with a functioning democracy and thriving economy, would be a model for other nations in the turbulent Middle East.

    Iraqis will vote in parliamentary
    elections on Thursday

    But he added a specific reference to the inspiration that a free Iraq could provide to reformers in the region's two governments most hostile to the United States - Syria and Iran.

    The president is banking on a successful election to signal that his war plan is working.

    If the voting establishes a successful government, it eventually could lead to the withdrawal of US forces.

    Bush could use more good news in Iraq.

    More convincing needed

    With the violence showing no sign of waning, most Americans are unhappy with his handling of the war, and some lawmakers are questioning how long the troops should stay.

    At a news conference before Bush's speech on Wednesday, Harry Reid, the Senate minority leader, said: "Tomorrow's elections must signal a turning point in the relationship between America and Iraq."

    The Nevada Democrat said that judging by the last three Iraq speeches, the president "is still not focused on what needs to be done in convincing the American people and showing the American people what his plan is in Iraq".

    SOURCE: Unspecified


    Venezuela in default: What next?

    Venezuela in default: What next?

    As the oil-rich country fails to pay its debt, we examine what happens next and what it means for its people.

    The Muslims of South Korea

    The Muslims of South Korea

    The number of Muslims in South Korea is estimated to be around 100,000, including foreigners.

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    What is Mohammed bin Salman's next move?

    There are reports Saudi Arabia is demanding money from the senior officials it recently arrested.