Nepal lifts state of emergency

Nepal's King Gyanendra has lifted the state of emergency he imposed after firing the government in February.

    Gyanendra imposed the state of emergency on 1 February

    A palace statement on Saturday said the king, in accordance with the constitution, lifted the order of the state of emergency.

    The king imposed emergency rule on 1 February, taking absolute power and suspending civil liberties. The move was widely condemned both within Nepal and internationally.

    The emergency was due to expire on Monday, but the announcement came after Gyanendra returned on Friday from visits to China, Indonesia and Singapore, where leaders pressed him to restore democracy in Nepal.

    Since emergency rule was imposed, hundreds of politicians have been jailed.

    Scrap commission

     

    Opposition figures welcomed the decision to lift the emergency, but urged the king also to scrap the anti-graft Royal Commission for Corruption Control (RCCC), formed on 16 February.

     

    The powerful anti-graft body can summon, investigate, and arrest suspects and file cases and pass judgment on corruption charges against figures including politicians, business people and civil servants.

     

    Critics have said the commission is able to act on flimsy evidence provided by anonymous sources, and is used by the king as a political weapon to control and intimidate his opponents.

     

    "The continuation of the RCCC is unconstitutional and shows the king is trying to impose direct rule"

    Sri Hari Aryal,
    constitutional expert

    "The news of lifting the state of emergency after three months of its enforcement is a welcome step but the continuity of the RCCC is absurd as it is merely to terrify or frighten politicians or businessmen," a senior leader of the Nepali Congress (Democratic) Gopal Man Shrestha, said.

     

    "After the lifting of the state of emergency in the country, the RCCC is king Gyanendra's political weapon to terrify the political opposition and general public," he said.

     

    Both domestic and overseas critics have said the king's power grab is unconstitutional.

     

    "The continuation of the RCCC is unconstitutional and shows that the king is trying to impose direct rule," constitutional expert Sri Hari Aryal said.

    SOURCE: Agencies


    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    Revival: The Muslim Response to the Crusades

    This part of 'The Crusades: An Arab Perspective' explores the birth of the Muslim revival in the face of the Crusades.

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    Going undercover as a sex worker

    A photojournalist describes how she posed as a prostitute to follow the trade in human flesh.

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    Africa is not poor, we are stealing its wealth

    It's time to change the way we talk and think about Africa.